Skip to content

Research comparing acute ACL reconstruction and delayed ACL reconstruction.

(R)esearch in (A)cute vs (D)elayed (A)CL (R)econstruction.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON23490
Enrollment
150
Registered
2012-11-13
Start date
2013-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

timing of surgery ACL rupture ACL reconstruction functional outcome

Interventions

Patients will be randomised in: 1. Early ACL reconstruction ( 3 months after injury).

Sponsors

Prof. dr. R.L. Diercks Dr. K. W. Wendt
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Active, pivoting sport player; 2. Age between 18 and 40; 3. Desire to return to pre-injury level; 4. Fresh ACL rupture (< 4 weeks); 5. Diagnosis with positive Lachmann/pivotshift and/or MRI.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Re-injury ACL; 2. Concommitant lesion same/other site (for example a fracture); 3. Multiple ligamentous injury; 4. Chondropathy grade IV; 5. A persisting loss of extension of 10 degrees and flexion deficit of 20 degrees, not of cyclops or bucket-handle origin.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Early ACL reconstruction results in less loss of function and muscle strength of the knee and in an faster return to the pre-injury level of activity, which will be objectively measured with a sequence of hoptests.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Also, a costs effectiveness analysis associated with the ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation and costs associated ( time off work, fysiotherapeutic costs, etc) will be performed.

Contacts

Public ContactRoeland Boer, den

Hanzeplein 1

r.h.den.boer@umcg.nl+31 (0)6 41959335

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)