Skip to content

Enema versus high doses of PEG 3350 in the treatment of rectal fecal impaction.

Enema versus high doses of PEG 3350 in the treatment of rectal fecal impaction.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON23431
Enrollment
90
Registered
2006-02-07
Start date
2006-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Childhood constipion

Interventions

At intake a standardized questionnaire is obtained by a physician to the parents and patient. Physical examination, including abdominal and rectal examination is acquired by the physician to define th

Sponsors

geen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 4-18 years; 2. Fecal impaction upon rectal exam.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous colonic surgery; 2. Organic cause of constipation; 3. Allergy/sensitivity to PEG solutions or phosphates; 4. Allergy/sensitivity to sodium ducosate or sorbitol (“Klyx” enema).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rectal fecal impaction evaluated by rectal examination/abdominal x-ray.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Defecation frequency/week; 2. Fecal incontinence frequency/week; 3. The number of side effects, such as abdominal pain, bloating, flatulence, nausea, bad taste; 4. Total and segmental colonic transit time.

Contacts

Public ContactMarc A. Benninga

Kinderarts MDL, AMC, H7-248 P.O. Box 22660

m.a.benninga@amc.nl+31 (0)20 5663053 / +31 (0)20 5666297

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)