2D vs 3D uitlining van een totale knie prothese

Prospective analysis of Patient-specific matched instruments comparing x-ray- (2-D) with MRI (3-D) based reconstructed preoperative templates of the knee joint for total knee arthroplasty

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON23291

Enrollment

Registered

2017-02-09

Start date

2017-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with osteoartritis initiated for total knee arthroplasty

Interventions

PSI base on x-ray

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: o MRI based PSG

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: o CT based PSG o Surgeries primary done by a resident

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To demonstrate that x-ray based-PSI can be used as template modality to predict the actual size of both the tibial and femoral component sizes as used intraoperatively with MRI-based PSMI, with the aim to reduce costs.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Number of adjustments will be calculated for both the X-ray and MRI-based templates o the preoperative plan before approval o the approved plan during surgery o the default plan during surgery o predicted sizes correctly by the software. o predicted sizes correctly with an error of 1 size	—

Contacts

Public ContactM.G.M. Schotanus

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orbis Medisch Centrum dr H vd Hoffplein 1

m.schotanus@zuyderland.nl+31 (0)88 4597823

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)