Skip to content

The missing link: optimizing return-to-work for employees with cancer, by supporting employers

A pilot-RCT to study the effectiveness of an intervention targeting employers, for successful return to work of employees diagnosed with cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON23290
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-10-30
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, return to work, worker, employee, employer. Kanker, werkhervatting, werknemer, werkgever.

Interventions

The intervention consists of an online toolbox targeting the participant’s employer. With ‘employer’ we refer to the person who is, from his/her role as (direct) supervisor, human resource manager or

Sponsors

Amsterdam UMC, location AMC / University of Amsterdam (UvA) and University Maastricht (UM).
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Diagnosed with cancer 6 months remaining) or permanent contract on part-time, full-time of flexible basis. - Able to understand, speak and read Dutch sufficiently.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Not yet disclosed being diagnosed with cancer to the employer.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure of the intervention is the combined outcome measure successful RTW. This outcome measure is a combination of RTW (having performed work activities in own work or in replacement work during the past four weeks) and a subgroup analyses for the ones that did return to work: degrees of successfulness of RTW (a new weighted, on individual level, outcome measure). The degrees of successfulness of RTW contains seven items, which were found to constitute successful RTW most importantly, according to employees diagnosed with cancer: ‘enjoyment in work’, ‘work without sacrificing health’, ‘open communication with employer’, ‘perceived confidence from employer without assumptions about workability’, ‘feeling welcome at work’, ‘good work-life balance’ and ‘joint satisfaction about the work situation (employer and employee)’. Each participant rates each items on its perceived importance and on its success. The combination of the items’ relative perceived importance and the items’ success determines the degrees of successfulness of RTW.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome measures are: Effectiveness of the intervention: - Quality of Working life - Unwanted work changes Others: - Participation in co-interventions - Contact with the employer

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)