Skip to content

Van spiegelbeeld naar patiënt in beeld

CVRM improvement in general practice: The added value of patient specific audit and feedback

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON23249
Enrollment
22
Registered
2014-03-05
Start date
2014-01-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with a 10 years risk for cardiovascular disease of 20% or more and patients with established cardiovascular disease, who are (probably)not treated according to (evidence based)practice guideline recommendations. Cardiovascular disease, Cardiovascular risk management (CVRM), Audit and feedback, Implementation, Primary care, Quality of Care, Quality improvement

Interventions

All practices receive feedback on practice level comparing recipients practice with median performance of all participants. The intervention group also receives feedback on a patient specific level .

Sponsors

Zorggroep Arnhem
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: At practice level: General practices who are contracted by care group in Arnhem for CVRM for more than 21 months. At patient level: 1) patients on simvastatin treatment with a LDL cholesterol level > 2.5mmol/L 2) patients with a history of stroke on acetylsalicylic acid or carbasalate calcium anticoagulance monotherapy . 3) patients aged 70 and older, without established cardiovascular disease and without chronic heart failure treated with 3 or more antihypertensive drugs. 4) patients with chronic kidney disease and eGFR < 45 ml/min who did not take additional laboratory tests (PTH, Hb, calcium, phosphate). 5) patients with a diastolic blood pressure lower than 70mmHg. 6) patients with established cardiovascular disease not on anticoagulant therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
mean difference between intervention group and control group for each indicator score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1)Mean difference between intervention group and control group for the total of indicator scores. 2)Reported experiences of general practices (in the intervention group) who worked with the patient specific feedback. 3) Percentage of patients who did not get a change in treatment regardless the specific feedback. 4) Arguments for choice concerning 3)

Contacts

Public ContactK.M. Jakobs
kjakobs@huisartsenzorgarnhem.nl+31612470221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)