A clinical comparison of two different retention systems for implant supported ear prostheses

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON23125

Enrollment

Registered

2014-05-27

Start date

2014-04-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

retention system of implant supported ear prosthesis Oorprothese met steg/clipretentie vs. magneetretentie

Interventions

New ear prosthesis with magnetic retention instead of bar/clip retention

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Bar/clip retained ear prosthesis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: None

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Patient's preference for either the bar/clip retained ear prosthesis or the magnet-retained ear prosthesis	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Prosthesishygiene	—

Contacts

Public ContactA. Linde

Centrum voor Bijzondere Tandheelkunde Afdeling Mondziekten, Kaak- en Aangezichtschirurgie Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen Postbus 30.001, BB70 9700 RB Groningen

a.linde@umcg.nl050-3612798

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)