Skip to content

Effectiveness of adding additional tests and/or comments to laboratory reports in a patient population, referred by general practitioners to the clinical chemistry laboratory.

Effectiveness of reflective testing in primary care.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON23047
Enrollment
400
Registered
2009-07-21
Start date
2009-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

As the procedure involves the inspection of all (abnormal) reports by a laboratory specialist, all related diseases will be subject to this investigation.

Interventions

Study design: a randomised clinical trial with reports with reflective testing vs. traditional reports. The randomisation of reports will be performed after the laboratory specialist has done the addi

Sponsors

Dr. Wytze P. Oosterhuis Arts Klinische Chemie, Epidemioloog Atrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad Klinische Chemie Postbus 4446 6401 CX Heerlen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The study will be restricted to those cases, in which abnormal test results require additional testing and/or comments, according to the laboratory specialist.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Cases in which there is substantial risk for the patient and normally (following the existing protocol) the lab would either send an urgent fax message to the practice or the laboratory specialist would directly make a telephone call to the general practitioner.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
In every case where a report with comments is generated (both in control and study groups), the following data will be collected: 1. Following laboratory reports; 2. Following treatments, referrals; 3. Other additional diagnostic procedures and patient data from the general practitioner.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
A panel (consisting of medical specialists) will be asked to answer the following questions: 1. How useful were the additional tests and comments for the patient?; 2. What was the benefit for the patient in terms of health improvement?; 3. Was the treatment adequate in the control group, without additional information reported to the general practitioner? This will be graded from negative to positive.

Contacts

Public ContactWilhelmine Verboeket-van de Venne

Atrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad Klinische Chemie Postbus 4446

wvenne@atriummc.nl+31 (0)45 - 5766303

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)