Skip to content

CATH trial.

A randomised trial determining whether intermittent catheterisation is a better option for treating urinary retention than a transurethral indwelling bladder catheter for the outcomes duration of catheterisation, urinary tract infection and patient satisfaction.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON22955
Enrollment
70
Registered
2007-11-27
Start date
2007-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

1. Treatment urinary retention

Interventions

Intermittent bladder catheterisation vs transurethral indwelling catheterisation for urinary retention (>150 ml residual volume) after vaginal prolapse surgery.

Sponsors

Spaarne Ziekenhuis Hoofddorp, department of gynaecology.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Women undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery; 2. Informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Simultaneously performed incontinence surgery; 2. Any neurological disease; 3. Any anxiety disorder; 4. Not speaking the dutch language fluently.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total duration of catheterisation (difference per 0.25 day).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Hospitalisation; 2. Bacteriuria/urinary tract infection; 3. Patient satisfaction.

Contacts

Public ContactR.A Hakvoort

Spaarne Ziekenhuis Spaarnepoort 1

rhakvoort@spaarneziekenhuis.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)