Patient preference, follow-up, percutaneous coronary intervention, TWENTE trial, DUTCH PEERS trial
Conditions
Interventions
All subjects will receive a questionnaire with questions regarding their preference with regards of the approach of acquiring follow-up information after PCI.
Patient and procedural characteristics
Sponsors
Cardio Research Enschede (CRE), Thoraxcentrum Twente,
Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: All patients enrolled in the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) studies TWENTE trial (a broad study population reflecting real-world PCI patients) and DUTCH PEERS trial (an all-comers population), who were treated at Thoraxcentrum Twente in Enschede between June 2008 and May 2012
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients who had withdrawn their consent for participation in the TWENTE and DUTCH PEERS trials, respectively. Patients who passed away during follow-up could obviously not be approached for further questioning
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Assessment of preferred approach for annual follow-up after PCI | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| - Least preferred approach for follow up - Relation between most and least preferred approach of assessment in relation to age, gender, urgency of PCI treatment, history of previous revascularization | — |
Contacts
Public ContactH. Verheij
Medisch Spectrum Twente Haaksbergerstraat 55
Outcome results
None listed