Skip to content

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early stage endometrial cancer: a multi-centre cost-effectiveness study.

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early stage endometrial cancer: a multi-centre cost-effectiveness study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON22764
Enrollment
275
Registered
2006-11-20
Start date
2007-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrioid adenocarcinoma grade 1, or 2, clinically stage I disease, negative endocervical curettage or -biopsy

Interventions

Laparoscopy (TLH+BSO) compared to the standard approach by laparotomy (TAH+BSO) through a vertical abdominal midline incision.

Sponsors

University Medical Center Groningen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with early stage endometrial cancer (endometrioid adenocarcinoma grade 1 or 2, clinically stage I disease, negative endocervical curettage); 2. Signed written informed consent; 3. Age 18 years and older.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Other histological types than grade 1 or 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma; 2. Clinically advanced disease (stage II to IV); 3. Uterine size larger than 10 weeks gestation; 4. Cardio pulmonary contra indications for laparoscopy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Our main outcome is the rate of major complications, being an indicator of clinically relevant treatment related morbidity. Major complications considered are: injuries of bowel, bladder, ureter, vessel, nerves; thrombo-embolic events such as deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism; haematoma requiring surgical intervention; haemorrhage requiring transfusion and/or surgical intervention; wound dehiscence requiring surgical intervention or re-admission; wound infections including vaginal vault abscess, requiring surgical intervention and/or prolonged hospital stay and/or readmission and/or treatment; other major complications.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Costs and cost-effectiveness; 2. Minor complications; 3. Quality of life, sexual functioning, body image and VAS pain.

Contacts

Public ContactClaudia B.M. Bijen

University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Gynaecology, Hanzeplein 1

c.b.m.bijen@og.umcg.nl+31 (0)50 3611528

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)