Skip to content

Discussions in the classroom: Investigating the role of interpersonal communication of teachers and students within a school-based health intervention

Discussions in the classroom: Investigating the role of interpersonal communication of teachers and students within a school-based health intervention

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON22719
Enrollment
1120
Registered
2017-10-30
Start date
2017-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The intervention aims to decrease unhealthy behaviors such as excessive alcohol use and consumption of unhealthy snacks.

Interventions

- In Charge school intervention (e.g., self-control, social norms, self-efficacy, attitudes) - Control condition (Do not receive anything until the randomized controlled trial has ended)

Sponsors

University of Amsterdam Trimbos Institute
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adolescents (16+) VMBO, MBO, HAVO, VWO students. MEC approval not needed as the study is nonmedical (no hospital or patients are involved).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No exclusion criteria.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We will measure the following variables: Behavior: Past and current behavior. Behavioral determinants: Intention, self-efficacy (non-use and refusal), social norms (injunctive and descriptive), attitudes (cognitive and affective), likelihood and evaluation of behavioral (dis)advantages. Interpersonal communication with several discussion partners (parents, teacher, friends, and classmates): frequency of discussions, valence of discussions, topic of discussions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Personality variables: perceived self-control, perceived ability to resist temptations. Student evaluation of teacher: Clarity, verbal immediacy, affinity, teaching style, emotional support, classroom organization, instructional support, attitude towards the teacher, adherence to intervention, and content relevance. Student evaluation of intervention: self-evaluation, state motivation, learning climate questionnare, and attitude towards the intervention, perceived relevance of the intervention. Demographic information: Gender, age, nationality, parents' nationality, type of education, home situation. In addition, we also plan to interview students and teachers about the intervention and their conversations with others about the intervention.

Contacts

Public ContactMathijs Mesman
m.mesman@uva.nl0614442363

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)