Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing using LigaSure versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON22699

Enrollment

100

Registered

2009-05-04

Start date

2009-04-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

vaginal hysterectomy, vessel sealing, ligasure, pelvic floor function vaginale uterus extirpatie, bekkenbodemfunctie

Interventions

Vaginal hysterectomy with the help of Ligasure device versus vaginal hysterectomy according to the conventional technique.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Candidate for vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease; 2. Age above 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Vaginal hysterectomy for prolapse; 2. Complaints.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Post operative pain as measured on the visual analoge score.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Surgery time, blood loss, hospital stay, limitations in daily functioning, pelvic floor function, generic quality of life and costs.	—

Contacts

Public ContactM.M.E. Lakeman

m.m.lakeman@amc.uva.nl+31 (0)6 30172563

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)