Skip to content

Beter Samen Beslissen

Effectiveness of individual feedback and coaching on shared decision-making consultations in oncology care: Study protocol for a pragmatic randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON22575
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-08-03
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

All oncological diseases

Interventions

The SDM intervention consists of four parts: an E-learning, reflection on feedback report, self-assessment and defining 1-3 personal learning questions, and face-to-face coaching.

Sponsors

This work was supported with unrestricted grants by oncology network OncoZON/Citrienfonds, health insurers DSW and CZ, Nutricia, and (voluntary) by participating clinicians.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Clinicians should conduct consultations in which a decision is to be made with the patient who is capable and willing to participate. In addition, choices do not have to relate directly to final treatment decision, but may also relate to other aspects of the care process. Consultations with palliatively treated patients with no prospect of cure, for whom decisions are to be made regarding quality of life, are eligible as well. Clinicians-in-training (residents) are also eligible as in the Dutch situation they work under supervision but communicate with patients independently.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non-Dutch speaking patients were excluded, unless they were accompanied by a person who spoke Dutch sufficiently. Clinicians who already received individual feedback on consultations and/or participated in a SDM training within the last 3 years are excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The extent in which clinicians involve their patients in the decision-making process, as scored using the OPTION-5 instrument

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
As secondary outcome patients will rate their perceived involvement in the decision-making and the duration of the consultations will be registered.

Contacts

Public ContactLoes Peters

Amsterdam UMC

l.j.peters@amsterdamumc.nl0612948515

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)