Specificity of the effects of parenting program components to reduce risk factors for child conduct problems

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON22548

Enrollment

192

Registered

2020-11-20

Start date

2021-05-09

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Children at risk for child conduct problems

Interventions

Component A: The Child's Game (Forehand & McMahon, 1981)

Component B: Positive Notes (Leijten et al., 2016

Van Aar et al., 2020)

Component C: Mastery Experiences (Bandura, 1997). Each components consists of an animation clip explaining the technique and daily exercises for two weeks.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Child age 3-8 yrs; parental concern about children's conduct problems.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Identified low IQ (<75); autism spectrum disorder.

Design outcomes

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Child conduct problems, parent-reported (Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory; Eyberg & Ross, 1987) and observed during online etch-a-sketch. Additional included outcomes (T6 and T12) are: parental hostility (PARQ and observed), sibling behavior problems (shortened ECBI), sibling relationship quality (SRQ), parental use of positive reinforcement techniques, parental attribution of disruptive behavior, child CU traits, parental mental health (DASS-21). All outcomes will be measured at baseline (T0), to allow for moderator analyses. In addition, we will measure at baseline (T0) various sociodemographics (child age and gender, parental educational level and income, single parenthood, cultural identification) to describe the sample and allow for moderator analyses to identify differential effects.	—

Measure

Time frame

Child conduct problems, parent-reported (Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory; Eyberg & Ross, 1987) and observed during online etch-a-sketch. Additional included outcomes (T6 and T12) are: parental hostility (PARQ and observed), sibling behavior problems (shortened ECBI), sibling relationship quality (SRQ), parental use of positive reinforcement techniques, parental attribution of disruptive behavior, child CU traits, parental mental health (DASS-21). All outcomes will be measured at baseline (T0), to allow for moderator analyses. In addition, we will measure at baseline (T0) various sociodemographics (child age and gender, parental educational level and income, single parenthood, cultural identification) to describe the sample and allow for moderator analyses to identify differential effects.

—

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Component A: Improved parent-child relationship quality, parent-reported (warmth subscale of the Early Childhood Parental Acceptance Rejection Questionnaire; Rohner, 2005) and observed during online etch-a-sketch, Oliver & Pike, 2019; Component B: reduced coercive parent-child interaction cycles, parent-reported (Parent-child Coercive Process Scale; Mitnick et al., 2020) and observed during online etch-a-sketch, Oliver & Pike, 2019; Component C: improved parental self-efficacy, parent-reported (self-efficacy subscale of Me as a Parent)	—

Measure

Time frame

Component A: Improved parent-child relationship quality, parent-reported (warmth subscale of the Early Childhood Parental Acceptance Rejection Questionnaire; Rohner, 2005) and observed during online etch-a-sketch, Oliver & Pike, 2019; Component B: reduced coercive parent-child interaction cycles, parent-reported (Parent-child Coercive Process Scale; Mitnick et al., 2020) and observed during online etch-a-sketch, Oliver & Pike, 2019; Component C: improved parental self-efficacy, parent-reported (self-efficacy subscale of Me as a Parent)

—

Contacts

Public ContactPatty Leijten

University of Amsterdam

p.leijten@uva.nl0031640236511

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)