Skip to content

Endotracheal suctioning: open or closed?

Prevention of cross-transmission of antibiotic-resistant pathogens by using closed instead of open endotracheal suction systems in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON22462
Enrollment
500
Registered
2006-09-18
Start date
2006-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

In mechanically ventilated patients, endotracheal suctioning will be performed when indicated. During two 6-month periods all ES procedures will be performed with either OSS or CSS. After 6 months, 1 month of wash out/wash in is planned, during which the system is changed.

Interventions

Endotracheal suctioning as indicated, according to a protocol, with either CSS or OSS.

Sponsors

None
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All adult ICU patients receiving MV will be included and, during 6 months, be subjected to the same ES-procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No exclusion criteria. Preference of ES system is often based on assuptions, there is currently no scientific evidence available to prefer one system over the other.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Occurrence of cross-transmission (primary endpoint), defined as acquired colonization with a genetically identical pathogen with an epidemiological linkage to a potential source patient.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of stay in ICU, antibiotic use, cardio-respiratory adverse events (hypoxemia, cardiac arrhythmia, damage to respiratory mucosa), mortality, the incidence of VAP and cost-efficacy.

Contacts

Public ContactI.P. Jongerden

P.O. Box 85500

i.p.jongerden@umcutrecht.nl+ 31(0)30 2503304

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)