Open vs closed tibial osteotomy.

Midterm results open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy: A follow-up study.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON22261

Enrollment

Registered

2011-12-08

Start date

2012-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Open wedge, closed wedge, tibial osteotomy, midterm results, RCT

Interventions

None, this is a follow-up study for midterm results of an earlier study of Gaasbeek et al (CMO 2002/81).

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients who had a CWO or OWO and participated in the study CMO 2002/181; 2. See protocol CMO 2002/81.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: See protocol CMO 2002/81.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Survival rates with as endpoints TKA/UKA and re-operations at 5 year.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Visual Analogue Scale pain, VAS satisfaction, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS) and complications. Radiographic evaluation: Radiographs of varus leg alignment (loss of correction), of OA of the knee on AP and lateral views radiographs, Caton’s index (CI) and tibial slope on true lateral radiograph views in 30gr of flexion.	—

Contacts

Public ContactS. Grinsven, van

Wagnerlaan 55

SvanGrinsven@Alysis.nl+31 (0)88 0056366

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)