Relationship problems
Conditions
Interventions
The protocolized intervention is based on the official Dutch translation of the HmT program (Eekhoudt et al, 2010) and adapted for online use (Siderius et al., unpublished). The eight online sessions
Sponsors
None.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Being a partner in a couple relationship.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: no exclusion criteria because partners refer themselves to this online programm
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Relationship Satisfaction measured with the 4-item version of the Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI-4; Funk & Rogge, 2007). Previously a Cronbach’s alfa of .93 was reported (Doss et al., 2017). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Attachment with the partner. The Experiences in Close Relationships Relationship Structure questionnaire for partners (ECR-RS; Fraley et al., 2011) measures adult attachment in the current romantic relationships. It contains 9 items and 2 subscales with Cronbach’s a’s of .85 and .84. Relationship Dynamics will be assessed with 4 item version of the Relationship Dynamics Scale (RDS; Stanley & Markman, 1997). The RDS converges with other comparable constructs (Stanley et al., 2005). Separation potential measured with a shortened 3-item version of the Marital Instability Index (MI; Edwards et al., 1987). The questionnaire was used by Doss et al. (2020) who reported a Cronbach’s a of .83. | — |
Contacts
Public ContactHenk Jan Conradi
University of Amsterdam
Outcome results
None listed