Shared decision making, Values clarification methods, decision aid, analytic hierarchy process, prostate cancer
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: - Men that are newly diagnosed with localized early staged prostate cancer. ‘Early stage’ prostate cancer is defined by a T1c-T2c tumour with a maximum PSA-score of 20 and a maximum Gleason-score of 7. - Patients are eligible for active surveillance and active treatment. - Patients who want to use the web-based decision aid. - Patients have to be able to make use of a computer with internet-access in order make use of the web-based decision aid and the AHP model. - Patients have to be able to complete a Dutch questionnaire.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Patients with advanced cancer; the decision aid is not suitable for decisions involved in a more advanced stage of the cancer (any score higher than mentioned as inclusion criteria). - If the urologist judges the patient is not in the right condition to participate, the patient will not be approached.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| - Disease-specific knowledge - Decisional Conflict (special interest: informed subscale) = subjective knowledge - Value congruence by measuring indicated preferences, changes in preferences - Decision quality | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Patients’ evaluation of the AHP- model (acceptability) - Consistency of patient’s answers - Reduction of proportion of patients who did not indicate a specific preferred treatment option after use of the DA by adding the AHP model to the existing DA. - Satisfaction with decision (making) - Satisfaction with treatment - Preparation for decision making - Decisional regret - Demographics - Health skills (numeracy and literacy) | — |
Contacts
Erasmus MC/Elisabeth- TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Urologie