Skip to content

The role of sensory signals on satiety and food preferences.

The role of sensory signals on satiety and food preferences.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON22093
Enrollment
40
Registered
2011-04-28
Start date
2011-05-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eating Behaviour

Interventions

The study will consists of three test days, which will be separated by 1 week. These test days involve consumption of pre-determined iso-caloric diets consisting of only sweet products (sweet diet), o

Sponsors

Wageningen University, Department of Human Nutrition
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age: 18-35 years; 2. BMI: 18.5 – 25.0 kg/m2; 3. Healthy (as judged by the participant).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Restraint eating (men: score > 2.25; women: score > 2.80); 2. Lack of appetite; 3. Having difficulties with swallowing/eating; 4. Usage of an energy restricted diet during the last two months; 5. Weight loss or weight gain of 5 kg or more during the last two months; 6. Stomach or bowel diseases; 7. Kidney disorders; 8. Diabetes, thyroid disease, other endocrine disorders; 9. Usage of daily medication other than birth control pills; 10. For women: Pregnant or lactating; 11. Smoking (at least one cigarette a day); 12. Being a vegetarian; 13. Being allergic/intolerant for products under study; 14. Having participated in studies that have used the LFPQ: ‘RiceTime’, ‘LunchTime’, ‘ProStudy’, and ‘ProTime’, or current participation in other research from the division of human nutrition (WUR).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Our main outcome measurement is the difference in energy intake (kJ) during an ad libitum test meal after 24h of a sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To assess the effect of a sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet on subjective ratings of appetite using a VAS; 2. To assess the effect of a 24h sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet on different aspects of food reward (explicit liking, explicit wanting, implicit wanting, relative food choice) of 4 different food categories (low-protein sweet, low-protein savoury, high-protein sweet, and high-protein savoury) using the computerized Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ); 3. To assess the effect of a 24h sweet diet, a savoury diet, and a control diet on cognitive associations of towards 4 different food categories (low-protein sweet, low-protein savoury, high-protein sweet, and high-protein savoury) using a Sorting Paired Features (SPF) task.

Contacts

Public ContactS. Griffioen-Roose

Wageningen University Division of Human Nutrition PO Box 8129

sanne.griffioen-roose@wur.nl+31 (0)317 485897

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)