Skip to content

Cost-efficiency of myoelectric upper limb prostheses

Cost-efficiency of myoelectric upper limb prostheses

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON21884
Enrollment
17
Registered
2020-06-26
Start date
2018-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper limb defects, including both amputations and congenital deficits.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria phase 1 & 2- MMP group: - Age 18 years or older - At least one year experience with an MMP, type be-bionic, I-limb or VINCENT - Owner of an MMP, type be-bionic, I-limb or VINCENT - The person is in a stable phase of the prosthesis provision process - Sufficient command of the Dutch language to follow instructions and complete questionnaires Inclusion criteria phase 2 - SMP group: - Age 18 years or older - At least one year experience with an SMP with one grip mode - Owner of an SHP with one grip mode - The person is in a stable phase of the prosthesis provision process - Sufficient command of the Dutch language to follow instructions and complete questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria phase 1 & 2- MMP group: - Co-morbidities that could influence the results of this study, like neurological disorders, rheumatic diseases, and other disorders that could affect the arm function - Owner of an MMP, type Michelangelo Exclusion criteria phase 2 - SMP group: - Co-morbidities that could influence the results of this study, like neurological disorders, rheumatic diseases, and other disorders that could affect the arm function

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cost-utility calculated with the Multi-Attribute Preference Response (MAPR) and total costs from a societal perspective, shown as an incemental cost-effectiveness ratio

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Box & Block test - Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) - Movement analyses focussed on compensation - Dutch user Quebec evaluation score (D-QUEST) - Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) - Orthotics and prosthetics user survey (OPUS) - Quality of life (RABD-36 & EQ-5D) - MAPR-score - Average costs from the SMP and MMP from a societal perspective

Contacts

Public ContactNienke Kerver

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen

n.kerver@umcg.nl+31503613553

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)