Skip to content

Comparison between tacrolimus suppositories and beclomethasone suppositories for rectal inflammation, not responding to previous 5-ASA treatment.

Tacrolimus suppositories versus beclomethasone suppositories for the treatment of proctitis refractory to local 5-ASA.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON21626
Enrollment
88
Registered
2014-01-30
Start date
2014-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ulcerative proctitis

Interventions

Arm A: tacrolimus suppositories 2mg, once daily, for 28 days Arm B: beclomethasone suppositories 3mg, once daily, for 28 days

Sponsors

Erasmus MC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Refractory ulcerative proctitis at least 3 months before randomization, proven endoscopically (inflammation grade score 2 or higher) or histologically (grading scale 2 or higher ). Proctitis is defined as disease activity up to 20 cm beyond the anal verge. Refractory proctitis defined as a failure to at least the use of 5-asa suppositories of a maximum of 1 gram for at least 21 days and recurrent proctitis is defined as relapse within 3 months after stopping of local adequate 5-asa treatment. Endoscopy may have been performed up to 3 weeks before screening, if the endoscopy was well documented and biopsies were taken. Age 18-70 years. Written informed consent. Permitted concomitant therapy: aminosalicylates, azathioprine, 6-mercatopurine and methotrexate at stable dose for 12 weeks,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Use of enemas within 14 days prior to randomization Infliximab or other anti TNF treatment within 12 weeks prior to randomization Treatment with tacrolimus prior to randomization Treatment with any investigational drug within 12 weeks of randomization Treatment with any form of corticosteroids within 4 weeks of randomization Abnormal renal function (eGFR 2 ULN). Other significant medical illness that might interfere with this study: Current malignancy, immunodeficiency syndromes. Any known pre-existing medical condition that could interfere with the patient's participation in and completion of the study such as: - Pre-existing psychiatric condition, especially depression, or a history of severe psychiatric disorder, such as major psychoses, suicidal ideation and/or suicidal attempt are excluded. Severe depression would include the following: (a) subjects who have been hospitalized for depression, (b) subjects who have received electroconvulsive therapy for depression, or (c) subjects whose depression has resulted in a prolonged absence of work and/or significant disruption of daily functions. Subjects with a history of mild depression may be considered for entry into the protocol provided that a pretreatment assessment of the subject¡¯s mental status supports that the subject is clinically stable and that there is ongoing evaluation of the patient¡¯s mental status during the study - CNS trauma or active seizure disorders requiring medication - Significant cardiovascular dysfunction within the past 6 months (e.g. angina, congestive heart failure, recent myocardial infarction, severe hypertension or significant arrhythmia). - Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus - Significant pulmonary dysfunction/chronic disease (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) - Renal insufficiency (elevated serum creatinine) - Pregnancy, lactation - Substance abuse, such as alcohol (80 gram/day), I.V. drugs and inhaled drugs. If the subject has a history of substance abuse, to be considered for inclusion into the protocol, the subject must have abstained from using the abused substance for at least 2 years. Subjects receiving methadone within the past 2 years are also excluded - Positive stool culture for enteric pathogens - Any other condition which in the opinion of the investigator would make the patient unsuitable for enrollment, or could interfere with the patient participating in and completing the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients in clinical remission and endoscopic remission after 28 days of treatment. Clinical remission is defined as a decrease in CAI score ¡Ü 1 with rectal bleeding and stool frequency scores of 0. Endoscopic remission is defined as no mucosal friability, and a ¡Ý 1-point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
-Proportion of patients responding (the proportion of patients achieving clinical improvement, defined as a decrease of ¡Ý3 points from baseline in the total CAI score) and the changes in sigmoidoscopic mucosal appearance (baseline to week 4) -Safety and tolerability of tacrolimus suppositories and beclomethasone suppositories. -Quality of life (IBDQ). -Changes in histopathology from biopsies taken before and after treatment (grading scale (0_ structural changes only, 1_ chronic inflammation, 2 _ lamina propria neutrophils, 3_neutrophils in epithelium, 4 _ crypt destruction, 5 _ erosions or ulcers)).

Contacts

Public ContactM. Lie

Erasmus MC Postbus 2040

m.lie@erasmusmc.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)