Multicenter, clinical study.
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Male or female patients; 2. age 40 years or greater; 3. suspected or diagnosed coronary artery disease with a clinical indication for coronary angiography and planned coronary angiography within the next 30 days; 4. able to understand and willing to sign the Informed Consent Form.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Known allergy to iodinated contrast media; 2. history of contrast-induced nephropathy; 3. history of multiple myeloma or previous organ transplantation; 4. elevated serum creatinine (> 1.5mg/dl) OR calculated creatinine clearance of 40.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Sensitivity and specificity of MDCTA for identifying coronary artery stenosis ¡Ý 50% in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease, compared with conventional coronary angiography. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The sensitivity and specificity of MDCTA for identifying coronary artery stenosis ¡Ý 70% in a patient with suspected coronary artery disease compared with conventional coronary angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of MDCTA for identifying coronary artery stenosis ¡Ý 50% in a single coronary vessel, compared with conventional coronary angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of MDCTA for identifying coronary artery stenosis ¡Ý 70% in a single coronary vessel, compared with conventional coronary angiography The sensitivity and specificity of MDCTA for identifying coronary artery stenosis ¡Ý 50% in a specific proximal coronary segment, compared with conventional coronary angiography The sensitivity and specificity of MDCTA for identifying coronary artery stenosis ¡Ý 70% in a specific proximal coronary segment, compared with conventional coronary angiography Predictive ability of MDCTA for cardiovascular clinical events within 6 months and 1 year, compared with conventional coronary angiography. The diagnostic accuracy of MDCTA for determining the degree of stenosis (continuous variable) per coronary vessel relative to conventional coronary angiography. The accuracy of on-site versus central reading of MDCTA. | — |
Contacts
Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Department of Radiology, Albinusdreef 2