The Severity of maxillofacial trauma in Southern Vietnam: a clinical evaluation of the MFISS and FISS.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON21517

Enrollment

1500

Registered

2006-07-17

Start date

2006-09-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

1. Maxillofacial trauma

Interventions

Measuring parameters: 1. Sex

2. AIS-90 (head and neck, face)

3. ISS

4. MFISS and FISS

5. Intubation criteria (A,B,C,D problem)

6. Neck injury

7. Brain injury

8. Associated injuries

9. Helmeted

10. Helmet-type

11. Driving speed during accident

12. Type of accident

13. Road type

14. Weather

15. Duration of hospital stay

16. Days on ICU.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients with maxillofacial injuries transferred and/or referred to the NHOS-HCMC, Vietnam. This hospital is mainly responsible for treatment of the maxillofacial trauma patients in Southern Vietnam.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: N/A

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
In this epidemiologic study a cohort of patients with MFT transferred and/or referred to the National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology Ho Chi Minh City (NHOS-HCMC), Vietnam, was analyzed following the MFISS and FISS protocol. This study will give a description of the current situation in Vietnam concerning maxillofacial trauma. The MFISS and FISS are proportionally compared to each other. The MFISS will probably give a more clear representation regarding the extent of the maxillofacial trauma and a greater predictive value regarding the time of the healingproces.	—

Measure

Time frame

In this epidemiologic study a cohort of patients with MFT transferred and/or referred to the National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology Ho Chi Minh City (NHOS-HCMC), Vietnam, was analyzed following the MFISS and FISS protocol. This study will give a description of the current situation in Vietnam concerning maxillofacial trauma. The MFISS and FISS are proportionally compared to each other. The MFISS will probably give a more clear representation regarding the extent of the maxillofacial trauma and a greater predictive value regarding the time of the healingproces.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Another aim is to evaluate the effects of non-helmet usage on traumatic brain injury, neck injury and severity of facial injury among injured motorcyclists using the AIS-90 (head and neck, face), MFISS and FISS scores. This data is compared with data of maxillofacial trauma in helmeted motorcyclist retrieved from trauma centers situated in HCMC (if possible), Amsterdam (AMC and VUmc) and literature.	—

Measure

Time frame

Another aim is to evaluate the effects of non-helmet usage on traumatic brain injury, neck injury and severity of facial injury among injured motorcyclists using the AIS-90 (head and neck, face), MFISS and FISS scores. This data is compared with data of maxillofacial trauma in helmeted motorcyclist retrieved from trauma centers situated in HCMC (if possible), Amsterdam (AMC and VUmc) and literature.

—

Contacts

Public ContactL. Dubois

Academic Medical Center (AMC), Department of Oral- and Maxillofacial Surgery, P.O. Box 22660

leander.dubois@amc.uva.nl+31 (0)20 5669111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)