Hallux valgus, scarf , chevron osteotomy, RCT, Deenik et al. 2007
Conditions
Interventions
Hallux valgus correction: Chevron vs. Scarf
Sponsors
None listed
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: o Participated in previous RCT by Deenik et al (2007).
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: o Patients who developed systemic joint disease, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis. o Psychiatric patients. o Patients who don’t want to contribute to this follow-up.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary endpoint will be the recurrence rate of hallux valgus and reoperation rate of the same toe for hallux valgus. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparing the initial results from the study with the long-term results between the scarf and chevron osteotomy. The secondary endpoints will be the results from the SF-36, Kitaoka /AOFAS rating system, MOXFQ and radiographic measurements IMA and HVA. The IMA is measured as the angle between the line of the first metatarsal and the line bisecting the diaphyseal portions of the second metatarsal. The HVA is measured as the angle between the line from the center of the metatarsal base to the center of the first metatarsal head and the line connecting the midpoints of the proximal and distal articular surfaces of the proximal phalanx. | — |
Contacts
Public ContactM.G.M. Schotanus
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orbis Medisch Centrum dr H vd Hoffplein 1
Outcome results
None listed