HSG versus HyFoSy: Is er een verschil in pijnscore tussen deze twee tubatesten?

HSG vs. HyFoSy: Is there a difference in VAS painscores between these two tubal patency tests?

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON21432

Enrollment

Registered

2012-05-31

Start date

2012-08-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subfertility, Tubal patency testing, painscores

Interventions

Tubal patency testing by Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography versus Hysterosalpingography.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Women between 18-41 years; 2. Low risk for tubal pathology according to medical history; 3. Chlamydia Antibody Titre (CAT) negative; 4. Valid indication for patency testing in the fertility work-up or before intra-uterine insemination treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Known or high risk for tubal pathology, CAT positive; 2. Known contrast (iodine) allergy; 3. If not willing or able to sign the informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
VAS pain scores.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Procedure time; 2. Difference in costs; 3. Amount of contrast medium needed.	—

Contacts

Public ContactK. Dreyer

Department of Reproductive Medicine VU University Medical Center PK 6Z K180 De Boelelaan 1118

k.dreyer@vumc.nl+31 (0)20 4445277

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)