Skip to content

De effectiviteit van echografie in de huisartspraktijk: Het optimaliseren van de behandeling van patiënten met schouderpijn.

Effectiveness of ultrasound imaging in general practice: Optimising the management of patients with non-chronic shoulder complaints. Maastricht Ultrasound Shoulder pain Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON21348
Enrollment
226
Registered
2010-07-05
Start date
2010-10-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with shoulder pain in primary care

Interventions

In a pragmatic design, which initially follows the guideline for shoulder pain of the Dutch College of General Practitioners, a study consisting of two phases will be carried out: a Qualification Peri
this fits within the first line treatment as recommended in the guideline for shoulder pain of the Dutch College of General Practitioners. During this Qualification Period all patients are advised to
2. Bursitis: Corticosteroid injection
3. Calcific tendinitis: Corticosteroid injection
4. Partial-thickness tendon tear: Physiotherapy
5. Full-thickness tendon tear: Referral to an othopedic surgeon. In case pathology other than rotator cuff disorders is diagnosed, it will be treated according to this diag

Sponsors

Dept. of General Practice, CAPHRI reserach school Maastricht University PO BOX 616 6200 MD Maastricht The Netherlands
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who visit their general practitioner with: 1. Shoulder pain upon abduction with painful arc; 2. Symptoms lasting no longer than three months; 3. First episode of SP for 12 months; 4. Men and women aged between 18 and 65 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Consultation or treatment for SP in the past three months; 2. Glenohumeral external rotation range of motion less than 45 degrees; 3. History of fractures of the proximal humerus or acromion, dislocation and/or surgery of the affected shoulder; 4. Shoulder complaints caused by rheumatic disease, suspected referred complaints or extrinsic cause; 5. History of depressive or anxiety disorders, or pain catastrophising; 6. Inability to complete a questionnaire independently; 7. Unable to give informed consent (dementia or psychiatric disorders); 8. Involved in disability or liability procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
A 20% difference between study groups in patient-perceived recovery after 52 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Shoulder pain; 2. Performance of daily activities; 3. Health-related quality of life; 4. Cost-effectiveness.

Contacts

Public ContactRamon Ottenheijm

PO Box 616

ramon.ottenheijm@hag.unimaas.nl+31 (0)43 3882338

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)