invasive hemodynamic monitoring has more complications compared to non invasive monitoring. However invasive monitoring is better compared to less invasive monitoring. Can less invasive monitroring devices be used during these procedure. hemodynamic monitoring SIRS surgery
Conditions
Interventions
Comparison:
invasive hemodynamic monitoring (PICCO) vs less invasive monitoring (ProaQt and FloTrac) and non invasive monitoring (nexfin/clearsight)
Sponsors
Radboudumc
Afdeling anesthesiologie, pijn en palliatieve geneeskunde
postbus 9101
6500 HB NIJMEGEN
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing a HIPEC procedure and receive hemodynamic monitoring with the TPTD through PiCCO monitoring. Patients older than 18 years
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Severe tricupid or aortic regurgitation - Severe peripheral vascular dissease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Determining the reliability of the less invasive hemodynamic measurement methods with respect to the reference measuring method (= TPTD), for a variety of pre-defined moments peri and post OK. Comparison absolute numbers; TPTD vs less invasive Cardiac Output (bias, precision, limits of agreement, percentage of error; Bland Altman plot). By time (T1 ... .T9), and all paired data points corrected for "repeated measurements". | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| ROC curve to detect SV change > 15% | — |
Contacts
Public ContactCor Slagt
Radboudumc
Outcome results
None listed