Skip to content

Compairing two cognitive aids

comparing two cognitive aids for teh treatment of anaesthetic emergencies

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON21025
Enrollment
24
Registered
2020-02-05
Start date
2020-02-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

anesthetic emergencies

Interventions

use of different emergency manuals

Sponsors

none
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: voluntary teams consisting of a consultant anesthesiologist and anesthetic nurse with a third medical professional

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: clinical inactive personnel

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Which emergency manual is most easy to use with the least missed critical actions and therefore improve patient care during anesthetic emergencies

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The use of an emergency manual will show less missed critical actions during anesthetic emergencies compared to not using an emergency manual at all.

Contacts

Public ContactMaartje van Haperen

Amsterdam UMC

m.vanhaperen@amsterdamumc.nl+31205669111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)