FindTrial
Sign In

Hand instruments are better accepted than rotary instrumentation for restoring tooth cavities in people with disabilities.

The suitability and effectiveness of the art approach for people with disabilities.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON20941
Enrollment
70
Registered
2014-01-15
Start date
2012-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

dental caries

Interventions

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in the clinic
conventional restorative treatment (CRT) in the clinic and under general anaesthesia (GA)

Sponsors

Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina and the Department of Global Oral Health, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with a recognised disability and at least one dentinal carious laesion in a primary or permanent tooth without pulpal involvement, spontaneous pain or tooth mobility, but in occlusion with the antagonist tooth or teeth and in contact with the neighbouring tooth or teeth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Survival of restorations—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Acceptance of treatment protocols - Suitability - Feasibiliy - Satisfaction of ART—

Contacts

Public ContactJ.E. Frencken

College of Dental Sciences P.O. Box 9101

j.frencken@dent.umcn.nl+31 (0)24 3614050

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)