Hearing Impared
Conditions
Interventions
All subjects will undergo loudness balancing and loudness ranking procedures to objectively assess the loudness growth functions. Subjective assessment of sound quality will also be measured.
Sponsors
Prof.dr.ir. J.H.M. Frijns
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Adult CI users Subjects with implantation of CI at least nine months prior to date of measurement Subjects perform at least 70% at CNC speech test (consonant-noun-consonant) at last clinical measurement
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Subjects who are unable to complete a consecutive 3 hours of testing due to medical circumstances or otherwise Subjects with severe tinnitus Subjects with hyperacusis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To discover the optimal pulse characteristics for controlled loudness growth with rapid pulse trains leading to a single pitch percept and eventually towards understanding of speech. We will create and evaluate loudness curves for multiple sequentially steered modalities. In the first stage, we will look at pulse characteristics for loudness balancing like pulse amplitudes at threshold level (TL) and most comfortable level (MCL), pulse width, amount of sequential pulses, interpulse interval (IPI) and physical space between stimuli for the different modalities. In the second stage, we will evaluate loudness growth by matching and ranking the experimental modalities in comparison to monopolar stimulation (MP). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Subject characteristics possibly influencing loudness growth or discrimination abilities like electrode position in the cochlea, recent CVC scores, demographics and duration of deafness. | — |
Contacts
Public ContactNicolaas van Groesen
LUMC
Outcome results
None listed