Skip to content

Captain Morgan Study

Comparison of effectiveness of Captain Morgan versus Allis technique in reduction of posterior dislocation of total hip prosthesis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON20769
Enrollment
242
Registered
2020-03-02
Start date
2020-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Posterior disclocation of total hip prosthesis

Interventions

In one group, the Captain Morgan technique will be used to reduce the hip, in the other group the Allis technique will be used.

Sponsors

None
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Unilateral posterior dislocation of a total hip prosthesis - Age = 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Concomittant traumatic findings that complicate reduction or are of greater urgency (e.g. (periprosthetic) fractures of the involved leg of life-threatening injury requering immediate intervention) - Previously >1 unsuccesfull reducation despite optimal circumstances (a.o. adequate sedation and procedural analgesia). - No informed consent or refusal of treatment. - Other reason to perform reduction in the operating room (logistics, personnel). - Hip prosthesis with a dual mobility cup (these always require reduction in the operating room).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total percentage of successfull reduction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of successful reduction subdivided by physician experience Percentage of successful reduction subdivided by amount of dislocation Percentage of successful reduction subdivided by number of previous dislocation (e.i. first vs. multiple dislocations).

Contacts

Public ContactTheo Broekema

Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden

t_broekema88@hotmail.com+31630163289

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)