Skip to content

Vibrational stimulation on the skin to provide feedback about the grasping force or hand opening of forearm prostheses during daily life grasping tasks.

Vibrotactile feedback in forearm prostheses in daily life grasping tasks.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON20497
Enrollment
20
Registered
2013-03-20
Start date
2013-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

forearm amputation - amputatie van de onderarm congenital defect of the forearm - aangeboren gemis van de onderarm myoelectric forearm prosthesis - myoelektrische onderarmprothese

Interventions

All subjects will be asked to perform grasping tasks (1-within a standardized protcol using the SHAP test, 2-grasping of delicate daily life objects, 3-grasping of abstract objects varying in weight,

Sponsors

University of Twente
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age between 18 and 65 years; 2. Able to control the experimental setup; 3. Forearm circumference between 24 and 28 cm (healthy subjects); 4. Forearm stump of at least 8 cm (patients); 5. Myoelectric prosthesis user (patients).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Self-reported diminished sense of touch (healthy subjects); 2. Experience with vibrotactile stimulation (healthy subjects); 3. Experience with EMG control of a prosthesis or other device (healthy subjects); 4. Extreme skin problems at the forearm; 5. Mental problems; 6. Hypersensitivity of the skin of the stump (patients).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The performance in the grasping tasks, expressed in: 1. The time needed to perform the tasks; 2. The success in grasping (percentage objects grasped without slippage or breakage); 3. The Index of Functionality (IoF), the main outcome measure of the SHAP test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. The number of trials needed to successfully hold the object; 2. The force safety marging (difference between the required and the applied grasping force); 3. The percentage correcly identified objects (indication of object stiffness, size and weight).

Contacts

Public ContactH.J.B. Witteveen

Biomedical Signals and Systems Twente University Drienerlolaan 5

h.j.b.witteveen@utwente.nl+31 (0)53 4892766

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)