Skip to content

The influence of different flow rates of intrathecal baclofen infusion on dystonia and pain in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1

The influence of different flow rates of intrathecal baclofen infusion on dystonia and pain in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON20461
Enrollment
14
Registered
2008-04-08
Start date
2008-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1

Interventions

1. Before the start of the study all patients have received continuous ITB with a concentration of 3000 µg/ml. The study starts with replacing the current substitution of 3000 µg/ml baclofen by rando
750 µg/ml ¨C 4-fold increase). 2. During a 2 week period, the first allocated flow rate will be used. The following week, baclofen will be administered using the baseline flowrate in an unblinded

Sponsors

Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Department of Neurology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients must suffer from tonic or intermittent dystonia in one or more extremities. 2. Patients have an implanted programmable pump (SynchroMed® pump, Medtronic, Minneapolis MN, USA, 40 mL reservoir) for continuous IT drug administration. 3. Patients have shown an insufficient response to ITB at the usual flow rate, that is a <25% improvement on dystonia severity while ITB was administered to a level of at least 1000 µg/day or lower because of dose-limiting side effects. 4. Patients must report spontaneous dystonia of at least 5 on a numeric rating scale (0 represents no dystonia, 10 represents worst imaginable dystonia).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: N/A

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Severity of pain and dystonia using a NRS.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Efficacy as evaluated by dystonia severity (Burke-Fahn-Marsden scale), patient¡¯s preference (PPQ), and global impression of improvement after each treatment (global impression scale). 2. Safety of the procedure as evaluated by the occurrence of adverse events.

Contacts

Public ContactA.A. Plas, v.d

Neurology Resident & Clinical Research Fellow

A.A.van_der_Plas@lumc.nl+31 (0)71 526 6065

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)