Skip to content

Does an easy device help doctors to diagnose COPD.

Microspirometry as a ‘point of care’ test in diagnosing COPD by the general practitioner; a cluster-randomised trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON20427
Enrollment
22
Registered
2013-06-20
Start date
2013-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD diagnostic procedure

Interventions

GPs will be instructed by an e-learning module on diagnosing chronic airway obstruction/COPD and the role of microspirometry therein, including a practical guide on how to use the microspirometer. Mor

Sponsors

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Department of primary and community care
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: General practices with at least one participating GP. These GPs will be asked in the intervention group to use the microspirometer for patients who fulfilled the following criteria: • 50 years or older • (previous) smoking for at least 3 months •Respiratory symptoms that could indicate COPD (dyspnoea, cough, mucus, and/or wheezing) •No previous diagnosis of asthma and/or COPD •If a lung function test had taken place previously, then this must be at least five years ago.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A general practice who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: • Practices that had a full practice list screening for COPD in the last five years. • General practices in newly-built quarters (i.e., with relatively few older people). A newly-built quarter is defined as build in the last 10 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of diagnostic spirometric assessment to objectify the existence or absence of a chronic airflow obstruction within 3 months after a patients at risk for COPD visited the GP.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Does microspirometry compared to usual care results in: 1) A higher proportion of diagnostic spirometry tests that revealed an airway obstruction (i.e., efficiency); 2) Increased number of diagnostic spirometry test that were requested; 3) Increased number of diagnostic spirometry tests that were carried out; 4) Improved attitude of GPs regarding COPD; 5) Reduced costs to identify one chronic airway obstruction.

Contacts

Public ContactLisette Bemt, van den

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Department of primary and community care P.O. Box 9101

l.vandenbemt@elg.umcn.nl+31(0)243619588

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)