The pro and cons of yearly imaging after minimally invasive aorta repair according to patients

Benefits and harms of standardised imaging surveillance after EVAR experienced by patients.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON20409

Enrollment

138

Registered

2018-07-31

Start date

2018-09-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Endovascular aortic repair, Standardised imaging surveillance, Test Anxiety Scale, Surveys and Questionnaires

Interventions

Our study does not entail a (new) medicinal or surgical intervention. Patients will be asked to fill out standardised questionnaires.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Age above 17 year - Patients with an asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm - Patient with imaging after EVAR

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Insufficient understanding of the Dutch language or cognitively unable to complete Dutch questionnaires - Life expectancy less than 1 year

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To detect differences in anxiety levels directly after imaging surveillance and before obtaining the imaging result compared to baseline anxiety levels.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
- differences in global and physical health directly after imaging surveillance and before obtaining the imaging result compared to baseline anxiety levels. - the necessity of standardised surveillance according to patients	—

Contacts

Public ContactR. Balm

Academic Medical Center (AMC), Department of Vascular Surgery G4-111.1, P.O. Box 22660

r.balm@amc.nl+31 (0)20 5667832

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)