Promoting healthy eating with nudging.

Nudges in the fight against unhealthy eating: long-term effects, habit formation and reach as public health impact indicators.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

NL-OMON

Registry ID

NL-OMON20064

Enrollment

300

Registered

2017-08-17

Start date

2017-09-02

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unhealthy dietary behaviour

Interventions

In this study an intervention based on nudge theory will be evaluated with the aim to increase healthy food and drink consumption in football canteens. The intervention consists of the expansion of fo

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Football canteens: - Moderate size (600-1000 members) for feasibility reasons - Access to, and willing to share, sales records and profit margins of previous and current season - Both canteens need to be as similar as possible based on financial budget and member characteristics Teams: - Team needs to be part of one of the football clubs of which the canteen participates in the study - Age of all players ≥ 16 - All players are male - Team needs to play in the regular competition (no g-teams)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Football canteens: - Planned matches between teams from both football clubs (to avoid contamination of the intervention)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1) sales records of every product 2) habit strength (Self-Report Behavioural Automaticity Index (SRBAI)) 3) reach (number of people present in the canteen and number of people buying products in the canteen)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1) habit strength (Self-Report Behavioural Automaticity Index (SRBAI)) 2) reach (number of people present in the canteen and number of people buying products in the canteen) 3) net profit margin 4) self-regulation of eating behaviour (Self-Regulation Questionnaire for adults (SRBEQ)) 5) self-reported behaviour in the football canteen 6) healthy eating goals 7) adherence to the intervention 8) ease or difficulty with adherence ( interviews with canteen personnel) 9) acceptability of intervention (interviews with canteen personnel and players) 10) perceived effectiveness (interviews with canteen personnel)	—

Measure

Time frame

1) habit strength (Self-Report Behavioural Automaticity Index (SRBAI)) 2) reach (number of people present in the canteen and number of people buying products in the canteen) 3) net profit margin 4) self-regulation of eating behaviour (Self-Regulation Questionnaire for adults (SRBEQ)) 5) self-reported behaviour in the football canteen 6) healthy eating goals 7) adherence to the intervention 8) ease or difficulty with adherence ( interviews with canteen personnel) 9) acceptability of intervention (interviews with canteen personnel and players) 10) perceived effectiveness (interviews with canteen personnel)

—

Contacts

Public ContactMerije Rookhuijzen, van

De Leeuwenborch (building 201, room 4.055) Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen

merije.vanrookhuijzen@wur.nl+31 6-26194462

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)