Skip to content

Procedural propofol sedation with ketamine versus alfentanil and remifentanil in patients for cardiac ablation.

PARK study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
NL-OMON
Registry ID
NL-OMON20044
Enrollment
235
Registered
2015-03-26
Start date
2015-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

We evaluate the role of administering ketamine as an analgesic component of anesthesia in procedural sedation and analgesia therapy (PSA), compared with other analgesics (opioids), because of the increasing importance of cardio-respiratory stability, patient’s and physician’s satisfaction and comfort during procedures with PSA.

Interventions

For analgesia during procedural sedation, randomly ketamine will be used. An induction dose of 0,1 mg/kg will be administered and ketamine will continuously be administered with a perfusor in a dose o

Sponsors

Catharina Hopsital Eindhoven
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients were eligible if scheduled for treatment of atrial fibrillation with cardiac ablation under procedural sedation, aged 18 years or older and with an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class 1 to 3. Patients will be included in this study after given written informed consent before the treatment starts.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients will be excluded from the study if they are unable to give informed consent, are pregnant, have a known allergy to either study medication, are receiving treatment for neuromuscular or psychiatric disease or have a physical or communicational disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary goal of this study is respiratory stability with the applied sedational technique. Differences of at least 10% in respiration rate, number of apneas and oxygen saturation with the applied inspiratory fraction of oxygen, in combination with the administered doses of procedural sedation medication, between three study groups will be compared and is regarded as a statistically significant difference.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome measures include: Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation score; OAA/S (0 = fully sedated, 5 = not sedated) Ramsay score; RS (1 = anxious or restless or both, 8 = no response, even to pain) Hemodynamic parameters (mean heart rate, mean systolic blood pressure and mean diastolic blood pressure) Times (time required for the induction of PSA, time required for the procedure, total time PSA is administered and total recovery time) Total dosages of medication administered during the procedure Numeric Rating Scale; NRS (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) Aldrete score Patient’s satisfaction (Likert five-item scoring system, 1 = not at all satisfied, 5 = extremely satisfied) Physician’s satisfaction (Likert five-item scoring system, 1 = not at all satisfied, 5 = extremely satisfied) Side effects (nausea, vomiting) Other study parameters: Demographic characteristics (sex, age, length, weight, BMI, ASA physical status) Medical history (cardiac status, pulmonary status, renal status, diabetes mellitus, other diseases) Physical history (smoking, alcohol abuses, drugs abuses, history of PONV)

Contacts

Public ContactP.G.T.M. Broeren

Catharina Hospital Eindhoven

pim.broeren@catharinaziekenhuis.nl+31 40 239 9111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: NL-OMON (via WHO ICTRP)