Physical Performance
Conditions
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Resistance Training, Strength, Power, Speed, Sedentary Men
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how an artificial intelligence-generated resistance training program affects muscle performance in sedentary men aged 18 to 35 years. The main questions it aims to answer are: * How does an artificial intelligence-generated resistance training program affect the participants' ability to produce force? * How does this program compare with a resistance training program designed by a professional coach and with no structured resistance training? Researchers will compare three groups: an artificial intelligence-generated resistance training group, a coach-designed resistance training group, and a non-exercising control group. Participants in the two training groups will complete supervised resistance training three times per week for eight weeks. Participants in the control group will not take part in structured resistance training. Researchers will measure muscle performance before and after the eight-week study period to compare changes among the three groups.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALArtificial Intelligence-Generated Resistance Training
An eight-week resistance training program generated using artificial intelligence. The program was implemented in the Artificial Intelligence-Generated Training Group.
BEHAVIORALConventional Resistance Training
An eight-week resistance training program developed without the use of artificial intelligence. The program was implemented in the Conventional Training Group.
Sponsors
Marmara University
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Male * Aged between 18 and 35 years * Sedentary lifestyle * No participation in regular resistance training during the previous six months * No history of orthopedic, neurological, or musculoskeletal disorders
Exclusion criteria
* None specified
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Force | Baseline and after 8 weeks | Peak force was assessed during maximal voluntary isometric contractions using the Beyond Power Voltra 1 system. Measurements were obtained bilaterally for the quadriceps, hamstrings, plantar flexors, and dorsiflexors. |
| Impulse (0-100 ms) | Baseline and after 8 weeks | Impulse during the first 0-100 ms of maximal voluntary isometric contraction was assessed using the Beyond Power Voltra 1 system. Measurements were obtained bilaterally for the quadriceps, hamstrings, plantar flexors, and dorsiflexors. |
| Rate of Force Development (0-100 ms) | Baseline and after 8 weeks | Rate of force development during the first 0-100 ms of maximal voluntary isometric contraction was assessed using the Beyond Power Voltra 1 system. Measurements were obtained bilaterally for the quadriceps, hamstrings, plantar flexors, and dorsiflexors. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREser Ağgön, PhD
Marmara University
Outcome results
None listed