Skip to content

Effects of Motor Control Exercises With and Without Pressure Biofeedback in Recurrent Low Back Pain (MCE)

Effects of Motor Control With and Without Pressure Biofeedback-Guided Training on Pain, Transversus Abdominis Activation and Disability in Patients With Recurrent Low Back Pain.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07892079
Acronym
yes
Enrollment
48
Registered
2026-10-23
Start date
2026-10-20
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Motor control exercise, Revised Oswestry Disability Index., Pressure biofeedback, Transversus Abdominis, Recurrent Low Back Pain

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the effects of Motor Control Exercises (MCE) with and without Pressure Biofeedback-Guided Training in patients with recurrent low back pain. It will evaluate the effectiveness of both interventions in reducing pain, improving Transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle activation, and decreasing disability. The study will determine whether adding pressure biofeedback to motor control exercises provides better clinical outcomes than motor control exercises alone.

Interventions

OTHERMotor Control Exercise with Pressure Biofeedback-Guided Training

Participants will receive 45-minute sessions comprising a 5-minute warm-up, 35-minute Motor Control Exercises (MCE), and 5-minute cool-down, guided by Pressure Biofeedback (PBU). Weeks 1-2: ADIM, diaphragmatic breathing, multifidus activation, and heel slides (2-3 sets × 10 repetitions). Weeks 3-4: Straight leg raises, double-leg lowering, bridging, and quadruped arm/leg extensions (3 sets × 8-10 repetitions). Weeks 5-6: Standing ADIM, partial squats, planks, and sit-to-stand exercises (3 sets × 10 repetitions; planks 20-45 seconds).

Participants will receive the same 45-minute Motor Control Exercise (MCE) program as in experimental group, including warm-up, phased exercises (Weeks 1-6), and cool-down, with identical sets, repetitions, hold times, rest intervals, and progression criteria, but without Pressure Biofeedback (PBU). Standardized verbal instructions and tactile cues (TrA palpation) will guide muscle activation. The same physiotherapist will supervise both groups, with exercise completion and adverse events recorded in session logs.

Sponsors

University of Management and Technology Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This study aims to compare the effects of Motor Control Exercises (MCE) with and without Pressure Biofeedback-Guided Training in patients with recurrent low back pain. It will evaluate the effectiveness of both interventions in reducing pain, improving transversus abdominis muscle activation, and decreasing functional disability. Muscle activation will be assessed using real-time ultrasound imaging, while disability will be measured using the Revised Oswestry Disability Index. The study will determine whether adding pressure biofeedback to motor control exercises provides better clinical outcomes than motor control exercises alone.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recurrent LBP patients aged ≥ 18 to 45 years old. Both genders. Mild to moderate back pain with NPRS pain score value of between 3-6. At least 2 episodes of pain in the past 12 months, each episode lasting for 24 hours. No radiating pain below the gluteal fold. Patient able to perform ADIM.

Exclusion criteria

* Specific LBP attributable to identifiable pathology: fracture, malignancy, infection, inflammatory arthropathy Active lumbar radiculopathy with neurological deficit (sensory loss, motor weakness, or reflex changes in the lower limbs). Any referred pain below gluteal fold or neurological involvement in lower limbs is not included. Pathological conditions or diagnosed with disk herniation, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and spondylitis and other medical illnesses such as tumor, kidney disease, and visceral disease that can be related with low back pain excluded in this study. Participants who had undergone surgery for LBP in past 12 months. Pregnancy. Current participation in other physiotherapy or rehabilitation program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Pain Rating ScaleBaseline, 3 weeks and after 6 weeks post treatment11-point numeric with 0 representing No pain, 1-3 representing Mild Pain (nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 representing Moderate Pains (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 representing Sever Pain
REVISED OSWESTERY DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE (RODQ)Baseline, 3 weeks and after 6 weeks post treatmentThe Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (RODQ) is a valid and reliable 10-item questionnaire. Each item is scored 0-5, with total disability expressed as a percentage: 0-20% (minimal), 21-40% (moderate), 41-60% (severe), 61-80% (crippled/severe functional limitation), and 81-100% (very severe disability). Higher scores indicate greater disability.
REHABILITATIVE ULTRASOUND IMAGING (RUSI)Baseline, 3 weeks and after 6 weeks post treatmentRehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging (RUSI) is a non-invasive, reliable technique used to assess deep trunk muscle morphology, thickness, and activation. Transversus Abdominis (TrA) activation will be evaluated by measuring muscle thickness at rest and during contraction. Changes in muscle thickness will serve as an indirect indicator of muscle activation and lumbopelvic stability.
PRESSURE BIOFEEDBACKBaseline, 3 weeks and after 6 weeks post treatmentThe Pressure Biofeedback Unit (PBU) is a non-invasive device consisting of an inflatable pressure cell and gauge that provides visual feedback to improve lumbopelvic control during motor control exercises. It helps enhance abdominal muscle recruitment, reduce lumbopelvic instability, and improve movement control in patients with chronic low back pain.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Oct 24, 2026