Skip to content

A Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Anitocabtagene Autoleucel Versus Standard of Care in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Quadruplet Induction Followed by Anitocabtagene Autoleucel Versus Standard of Care Therapy in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Not Eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07887672
Acronym
iMMagine-4
Enrollment
600
Registered
2026-10-21
Start date
2027-01-01
Completion date
2042-02-01
Last updated
2026-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Multiple Myeloma, CAR-T, ddBCMA, BCMA

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical study iMMagine-4 is to compare and assess the safety and effectiveness of anitocabtagene autoleucel versus standard of care therapy (SOCT) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of anitocabtagene autoleucel versus quadruplet-based SOCT in participants with NDMM who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT).

Detailed description

After completing quadruplet-based induction therapy followed by anitocabtagene autoleucel or continuous maintenance therapy, participants will continue to be followed for disease assessments and outcomes.

Interventions

A single infusion of CAR+ transduced autologous T cells

DRUGDaratumumab

Administered subcutaneously (SC)

DRUGBortezomib

Administered SC

DRUGLenalidomide

Administered orally (PO)

DRUGDexamethasone

Administered PO or intravenously (IV)

DRUGFludarabine

Administered IV

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Administered IV

Sponsors

Kite, A Gilead Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Determined by the Investigator to be not eligible for auto-SCT * Documented newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) according to IMWG diagnostic criteria * Measurable disease at screening per IMWG: 1. Serum M-protein level ≥ 1.0 g/dL; or 2. Urine M-protein level ≥ 200 mg/24 hours; or 3. Serum free light chain (FLC) ≥ 10 mg/dL (100 mg/L) and abnormal serum FLC ratio * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2. * Adequate hematological function * Adequate renal, hepatic, pulmonary, and cardiac function Key

Exclusion criteria

* Any prior anti-MM therapy (including B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapy, CAR T-cell therapy, or genetically modified cells), with the exception of protocol-specified anti-MM stabilizing therapy and palliative radiation * Central nervous system (CNS) or meningeal involvement of MM * History of or active plasma cell leukemia, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, POEMS syndrome, or amyloidosis * Active malignancy (other than MM) requiring ongoing treatment for disease control within the last 24 months. * Prior allogeneic stem cell transplant * Any prior systemic treatment or radiotherapy treatment for any cancer other than MM within 24 months before randomization. * Live vaccine ≤ 4 weeks before randomization * Presence or suspicion of infection that is uncontrolled * History or presence of intracranial or CNS disorders, or CNS neoplasms (benign and malignant) * Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Females of childbearing potential who are not willing to use a highly effective method of contraception from the time of informed consent through the protocol-specified duration * Contraindication to fludarabine or cyclophosphamide * History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any trial agent or trial drug components * Life expectancy \< 12 weeks Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Complete Response (CR) or Stringent CR (sCR) Rate at 12 Months12 monthsMinimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR/sCR is defined as the proportion of participants achieving CR/sCR and MRD-negative status (10\^5 cutoff) at 12 months. CR/sCR per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria is determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC).
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Up to 15 yearsPFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria as determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival (OS)Up to 15 yearsOS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Up to 15 yearsORR is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve a best overall response of at least PR or better (sCR, CR, very good partial response (VGPR), or PR) per the 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC.
Rate of Very Good Partial Response or BetterUp to 15 yearsRate of VGPR or better is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve a best overall response of sCR, CR, or VGPR per the 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC.
Rate of CR or BetterUp to 15 yearsRate of CR or better is defined as the proportion of participants who achieve a best overall response of CR or sCR per the 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC.
Time to Response (TTR)Up to 15 yearsTime to response is defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date when a participant achieves a best overall response of sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR per 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC.
Duration of response (DOR)Up to 15 yearsDOR is derived only among participants who experience an overall response (sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR) per the 2016 IMWG criteria (Kumar 2016) and is defined as the time from first overall response to disease progression per the 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time to ProgressionUp to 15 yearsTime to progression (TTP) is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per the 2016 IMWG criteria as determined by the IRC, or death due to disease progression, whichever occurs first.
Duration of Treatment-Free IntervalUp to 15 yearsDuration of treatment-free interval is defined as time from date of anitocabtagene autoleucel infusion to date of initiation of maintenance therapy.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Enrollment up to 15 years—
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)Enrollment up to 15 years—
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Anitocabtagene Autoleucel Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Antibodies (Anitocabtagene Autoleucel Arm B)Up to 15 years—
Change From Baseline in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresBaseline, up to 5 yearsThe EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a multi-item questionnaire measuring the following content: five (5) multi-item functional scales, three (3) multi-item symptom scales, six (6) single item symptoms scales, and one combined global health status/global quality of life (QoL) scale. Each scale is measured from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores for functioning scales and for the Global Health Status /Global QoL scale indicate a higher level of functioning and a better QoL (ie, a better state of the participant), respectively, whereas higher scores in symptom scales represent a higher level of symptoms (ie, a worse state of the participant).
Change From Baseline in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) - Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) ScoreBaseline, up to 5 yearsThe EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales; 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment) with a recall period of one week. Scores from each subscale are transformed from 0 to 100. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening.
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life (EuroQol) 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scale index Score and VAS Scale ScoreBaseline, up to 5 yearsThe EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a generic measure of health status with two components: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analog scale (VAS). The descriptive system can be used to estimate a single index value through application of a tariff of values based on direct valuations of health. The index typically ranges from 0 to 1 where a higher score indicates a better outcome. The VAS is a 20-cm VAS for recording self-rated current HRQoL state where a score of 0 represents ("the worst health you can imagine") and a score of 100 represents ("the best health you can imagine").
Percentages of Participants With Responses for Patient Global Impression Scale - Severity (PGI-S)Screening, up to 1 yearThe PGI-S is a 5-point, single-item measure that assesses a patient's perception of disease symptom severity at a point in time.
Percentages of Participants Responses for Patient Global Impression Scale Change (PGI-C)Screening, up to 1 yearThe PGI-C is a 7-point, single-item measure that evaluates patients' perceptions of change in their symptoms over time.
Percentages of Participants With Responses for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Item GP5 (FACT-GP5)Screening, up to 2 yearsThe FACT-GP5 is a single-item question for assessing global treatment side effect bother from a patient's perspective.
Percentage of Participants Hospitalizations, Inpatient Days, Intensive Care Unit Days, and Reasons for HospitalizationUp to 15 years—

Contacts

CONTACTMedical Information
medinfo@kitepharma.com844-454-5483(1-844-454-KITE)
STUDY_CHAIRKite Study Director

Kite, A Gilead Company

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Oct 22, 2026