Skip to content

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Motor Imagery Exercises and Suboccipital Myofascial Release Techniques in Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Motor Imagery Exercises and Suboccipital Myofascial Release Techniques on Pain, Proprioception, and Kinesiophobia in Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07883915
Acronym
MI-SMR-NSCNP
Enrollment
51
Registered
2026-10-20
Start date
2026-11-01
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2026-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain

Keywords

nscnp, proprioception, pain management, motor imagery, suboccipital myofascial release

Brief summary

The aim of this three-group randomized controlled study is to investigate the effectiveness of MI and SMR interventions on pain, proprioception, quality of life, disability, and ROM parameters in individuals aged 18-50 with NSCNP. The primary research questions it seeks to answer are as follows: Do MI exercises, when applied in addition to active exercise, lead to changes in pain, proprioception, and kinesiophobia in individuals with NSCNP? Does the suboccipital myofascial release technique, when applied in addition to active exercise, lead to changes in pain, proprioception, and kinesiophobia in individuals with NSCNP? Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups to compare the MI and SMR techniques.

Detailed description

Proprioception is considered a crucial element in the seamless execution of pain-free movement. In cases of chronic pain, proprioceptive ability is compromised due to altered sensorimotor control at various levels of pain transmission. Motor imagery (MI) is utilized to enhance motor performance and facilitate the learning of motor tasks, while suboccipital myofascial release (SMR) improves neck-related disability and overall pain. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of MI and SMR techniques in the management of non-specific neck pain (NSCNP) remains limited. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of MI exercises and the SMR technique in the management of NSCNP through a multifaceted evaluation, and to expand the range of effective, sustainable, and accessible conservative treatment alternatives. A dual inclinometer, goniometer, and algometer will be employed in the study. Participants will undergo assessments including proprioception, pressure pain threshold, and neck range of motion (ROM). The data obtained will shed light on the efficacy of these interventions regarding parameters such as pain intensity, disability, and kinesiophobia, potentially serving as foundational data for the future development of diagnostic, therapeutic, and clinical processes in this field.

Interventions

Active exercises will consist of four cervical movements involving the maintenance of craniocervical flexion, and all of these exercises will be performed in a single session. The program will continue for six weeks.

OTHERMotor Imagery

Motor imagery exercises are structured in three stages. First stage: performing a guided mental task Second stage: internal visual imagery Third stage: external visual imagery The program will last for six weeks.

It will be performed by the therapist while the participant is in the supine position. The therapist will apply pressure to the suboccipital region until a reduction in muscle tone is detected. The procedure will be continued for six weeks.

Sponsors

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Having an MIQ-3 score that is at most two standard deviations above or below the mean, * Having a Dizziness Handicap Inventory score below 20, * Having a diagnosis of NSCNP

Exclusion criteria

* Wiplash, * Pregnancy, * Neoplasia, * Infectious or inflammatory disorders, * Specific neck pain resulting from traumatic events involving bone fractures or neck injuries, * Osteoarthritic changes, * Positive neurological signs or evidence of spinal compression, * Neck pain associated with vertigo, * Cervical surgeries, * Acute headache, * Headaches occurring prior to the onset of neck pain and headaches of non-cervical origin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proprioceptionbaseline, six weeksMeasurement will be performed using a dual inclinometer. Joint position sense error will be evaluated.
Pain Pressure Thresholdbaseline, six weeksThe pressure pain threshold will be assessed using an algometer.
Range of Motion (ROM)baseline, six weeksROM will be assessed using a goniometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia for Kinesiophobiabaseline, six weeks
SF-36 for Quality of Lifebaseline, six weeks
Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale for Neck Disabilitybaseline, six weeks
Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire for Pain Intensitybaseline, six weeks

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTAyça ŞİRİN, Master of Science
ayca41sirin@gmail.com+90 545 410 59 00

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Oct 21, 2026