Skip to content

Personalized Probiotic Treatments for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Deciphering the Role of Bacterial Histamine and Bioactive Phospholipids in IBS: Precision Medicine Pilot Study

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07872514
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-10-13
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2028-07-30
Last updated
2026-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)

Keywords

Gut microbiota, Probiotics, IBS, Precision medicine, N of 1 trials, Histamine, LPC, LPA

Brief summary

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by stomach pain and altered bowel habits. It affects about 5 million people in Canada. Doctors don't fully understand what causes IBS, so treatments often don't work well. Many patients say certain foods make their symptoms worse. This may be due to how gut bacteria break down food. Some bacteria produce harmful chemicals like histamine and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC)/lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which can cause pain and gut problems. These chemicals may affect about 35% of IBS patients. The goal is to find out which patients have these bacteria. Then, doctors can give them treatments that match their gut bacteria. This could help reduce symptoms and improve their lives. If the study is successful, it could change how we understand, diagnose, and treat IBS, leading to new treatments that focus on personalized microbiota-directed treatments targeting specific causative mechanisms.

Detailed description

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by chronic abdominal pain and abnormal bowel habits, affecting 5 million Canadians. Its pathophysiology is incompletely understood and treatments, directed at symptoms, are only 10-15% more effective than a placebo. In the absence of specific mechanistic biomarkers to guide the right treatment for the right patient, clinicians employ the classical "trial-and-error" therapeutical approach. This is often not successful, negatively impacting patients' quality of life and imposing a significant socioeconomic burden.Growing evidence suggests that diet-microbiota interactions play a key role in IBS, leading to low-grade inflammation and symptom genesis. Indeed, up to 84% of IBS patients link their symptoms to ingestion of specific foods. There are likely multiple food-related mechanisms that underlie symptom generation in IBS, including bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber, immunostimulatory effects of proteins contained in wheat, or inflammation-mediated sensitization to food antigens. We recently demonstrated that bacterial production of histamine and/or bioactive phospholipids lysophosphatidyl-choline (LPC) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) trigger visceral hyperalgesia and gut dysfunction in subgroups of patients, and which together can account for symptom genesis in approximately 35% of patients with IBS.The concept of precision (personalized) medicine has gained prominence in last few decades, moving away from a 'one-size-fits-all' approach, acknowledging significant variability in disease expression and treatment responses, and recognizing that the conventional approach based on large clinical trials is directed at "average patients". Despite its potential, precision medicine has seen limited adoption in clinical practice. Precision medicine for IBS has not yet been considered, because it is not perceived as life threatening and because of our limited understanding of its causes. However, during the last decade we have made significant strides in understanding the pathophysiology of IBS, identifying gut bacteria and diet as key factors, which can be modified. We recently showed that 20-25% IBS patients have bacteria that convert dietary histidine into histamine, a known pain mediator. Bacterial histamine drives accumulation and activation of mast cells, leading to the development of visceral hypersensitivity. A low fermentable carbohydrate (FODMAP) diet or lactic acid bacteria mitigate these effects by changing the acidity of the colon milieu, as bacterial histidine decarboxylase is highly pH-sensitive. Our on-going pilot study (NCT04364750) suggests that patients' symptoms and bacterial histamine change significantly with 3-day challenges or treatment with mixture of lactobacilli. Further, we found that additional 15-20% patients with IBS have altered bacterial metabolism of dietary phosphatidylcholine (PC) with increased production of LPC and its metabolite LPA, known mediators of neuropathic pain. IBS patient have higher levels of fecal LPC and LPA during periods of severe abdominal pain and mice colonized with their microbiota develop increased pain responses when fed a PC-enriched diet. Altogether, this suggests a synergistic effect between diet and microbiome in symptoms genesis in two subsets of patients with IBS. Therefore, this proposal seeks to establish a transformative process to optimize personalized treatment of patients with IBS, focusing on diet-microbiota interactions as key drivers of symptoms and intestinal pathology. N-of-1 trials, also called "personalized trials," employ a repeated randomized crossover design in a single patient to compare different blinded treatments or challenge effects. This design is most feasible when the treatment/challenge effects have a rapid onset and offset of action, as is the case in IBS patients, especially with food related symptoms. Indeed, these may occur as soon as 15 minutes postprandially, and may last for several hours. In addition, the microbiome and its metabolites are quickly affected by diet and dietary changes, with significant changes occurring within the first 24 hours in an in vitro model and within 48 hours in healthy volunteers. As in traditional crossover trials, carryover effects must be considered with n-of-1 design, but can be addressed through wash-out periods and focusing on the symptoms in the latter part of each treatment period. In general, n-of-1 trials are shorter lasting only months, while conventional randomized controlled trials (RCT) can take up to several years. When a series of n-of-1 trials are conducted in similar patients, the results can be aggregated to produce population-level estimates of treatment effects (equivalent to RCT meta-analyses). In this project, we will first identify IBS patients with histamine and LPC/LPA producing microbiota, and then treat them using "n-of-1" trial design using specific probiotics, either lactic acid-producing bacteria know to inhibit production of histamine through effects on histidine-decarboxylase4 or probiotics impairing conversion of phosphatidylcholine into LPC, in a fast-track bench-to-bedside approach.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTProbiotic containing B longum

This probiotic will be used in the group who have higher levels of LPC and LPA

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTProbiotic Lactobacillus

This probiotic will be used in the group who have higher levels of Histamine

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

Placebo - microcrystalline cellulose

Sponsors

McMaster University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Weston Family Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Principle Investigator and study Coordinators who are in contact with the participants are masked

Intervention model description

N-of-1 trials are single-patient, multiple-period crossover studies in which an individual serves as their own control, cycling through different active treatments and control/placebo phases in randomized order. By eliminating between-subject variability, this design is particularly powerful for conditions with rapid symptom fluctuations, personalized treatment responses, and high baseline heterogeneity, characteristics that make N-of-1 methodology ideally suited for precision medicine. When aggregated across multiple individual trials, N-of-1 results yield population-level estimates statistically equivalent to randomized controlled trial meta-analyses, enabling both individualized therapeutic optimization and generalizable evidence for evidence-based precision interventions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome * Willing and able to sign written informed consent * At least moderate IBS symptoms (IBS-SSS \>175)

Exclusion criteria

* Use of antibiotics, antibiotics or probiotics, currently or within the last 4 weeks * New IBS treatments (mediations, diet or psychotherapy) started within last 3 months. Medications will be allowed, provided the patient is on a stable dose for more than 3 months. * Current organic gastrointestinal or autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes, celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease * History of major gastrointestinal surgery (bariatric surgery, gastrectomy, colectomy, bowel resection) * Connective tissue disease * Alcohol or drug abuse * Concurrent systemic disease and/or laboratory abnormalities considered by investigators to be a risk or that could interfere with data collection Participation in another dietary or pharmacological treatment study within the last 4 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction in abdominal painReduction in abdominal pain severity (Visual Analog Scale) comparing probiotic-treatment weeks to placebo-treatment weeks across the 8-week study period.The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily lifeImprovement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily life (VAS) comparing probiotic-treatment weeks to placebo-treatment weeks across the 8-week study period.The visual analog scale (VAS) assessing improvement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily life assessed by Visual Analog Scale
3-month improvement in IBS symptomsBaseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)To evaluate sustained treatment effects beyond the acute study period, IBS symptom severity will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS), a validated instrument measuring overall symptom burden. This assessment compares symptom severity at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into the durability and longer-term impact of probiotic treatment on IBS symptom trajectory.
3-month improvement in somatizationBaseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)To evaluate the impact of probiotic treatment on psychological symptom manifestation, somatization will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), a validated screening instrument measuring somatic symptom burden. This assessment compares somatization scores at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into whether probiotic-mediated improvements in gut-brain axis function reduce the psychological distress experienced as physical symptoms.
3-month improvement in anxiety, depression and stressBaseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)To evaluate the impact of probiotic treatment on psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, and stress will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), validated instruments measuring emotional distress. These assessments compare psychological symptom scores at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into whether probiotic-mediated improvements in gut-brain axis function reduce the anxiety, depression, and stress burden commonly associated with IBS.
3-month improvement in Quality of LifeBaseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)To evaluate the broader impact of probiotic treatment on functional well-being, quality of life will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the IBS Quality of Life Instrument (IBS-QoL), a validated disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life. This assessment compares quality of life scores at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into whether probiotic-mediated improvements in IBS symptoms translate into meaningful gains in daily functioning, social engagement, and overall life satisfaction.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPremysl Bercik, MD

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Farncombe Institute, McMaster University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Oct 14, 2026