Skip to content

Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB) Combined With İnfiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (iPACK) Block vs Continuous Adductor Canal Block Alone After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparison of the Effects of iPACK Block Combined With Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block Alone on Postoperative Analgesia, Early Mobilization, and Length of Hospital Stay in Total Knee Arthroplasty Cases

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07851506
Enrollment
54
Registered
2026-10-01
Start date
2026-09-25
Completion date
2026-12-11
Last updated
2026-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Knee Arthroplasty, Postoperative Pain

Keywords

Adductor Canal Block, iPACK Block, Total Knee Arthroplasty, Postoperative Analgesia, Early Mobilization, Regional Anesthesia

Brief summary

This study compares the effects of adding an infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK) block to a continuous adductor canal block (CACB) versus continuous adductor canal block alone on postoperative analgesia, opioid consumption, early mobilization, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with 54 patients allocated 1:1 into two groups.

Detailed description

Severe postoperative pain occurs in up to 58% of patients after total knee arthroplasty. Peripheral nerve blocks are an effective component of multimodal analgesia, and the continuous adductor canal block (CACB) has become a preferred technique because it provides sensory blockade while sparing motor function of the quadriceps, allowing earlier ambulation compared to femoral nerve block. However, CACB does not address posterior knee pain, which can be targeted by the iPACK (infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block, a technique that blocks terminal sensory branches of the tibial and peroneal nerves without motor blockade. In this study, patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty will be randomized 1:1 (using randomizer.org) to receive either CACB alone (Group 2) or CACB combined with a single-injection iPACK block (Group 1). CACB will be maintained via a perineural catheter connected to a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump delivering 0.1% bupivacaine. Rescue analgesia will be provided with intravenous tramadol (50 mg, max 300 mg/day) when the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score exceeds 4. Pain scores (NRS 0-10), total analgesic and opioid consumption, hemodynamic parameters, time to first mobilization (assessed via the Timed Up and Go test), patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay will be recorded at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively by an anesthesiologist blinded to group allocation, different from the anesthesiologist who performed the block.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIPACK block

Single injection of 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL between the popliteal artery and posterior knee capsule, performed under ultrasound guidance

Perineural catheter placement in the adductor canal with PCA-delivered 0.1% bupivacaine (5-7 mL basal rate, 5 mL bolus, 30-min lockout) for 24 hours postoperatively

Sponsors

Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of either sex * Aged 18 to 75 years * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, or III * Voluntary participation * Fully oriented and able to cooperate with postoperative assessments

Exclusion criteria

* ASA physical status IV or V * Patients who decline to participate * Pediatric patients * Active infection at the block site * Chronic pain or regular analgesic use * Coagulation disorders * Inability to cooperate with postoperative pain assessment * Known allergy to local anesthetics * Neuropathy or myopathy in the operated extremity * Revision arthroplasty cases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain Score (Numeric Rating Scale)Baseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Opioid ConsumptionPostoperative 24 hoursTotal rescue analgesic (tramadol) consumption via intravenous (IV) administration
Total Local Anesthetic ConsumptionPostoperative 24 hoursTotal bupivacaine consumed via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump
Time to First MobilizationPostoperative 24 hoursTime to first unassisted ambulation/movement, assessed via the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
Length of Hospital StayFrom surgery to discharge (up to approximately 1 week)Number of days from surgery to discharge
Patient Satisfaction ScorePostoperative 24 hoursSatisfaction rated on a 4-point scale (1 = not satisfied, 2 = Slightly satisfied, 3 = Satisfied, 4 = very satisfied)
Systolic Blood PressureBaseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24Systolic blood pressure measured in mmHg
Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24Diastolic blood pressure measured in mmHg
Mean Arterial Blood PressureBaseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) measured in mmHg
Heart RateBaseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24Heart rate measured in beats per minute
Peripheral Oxygen SaturationBaseline and postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured as a percentage
Block-Related ComplicationsThroughout study participation (up to 24 hours postoperatively)Incidence of complications associated with the regional block techniques (e.g., nerve injury, infection)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTMuzaffer GENCER, MD
dr.m.gencer07@gmail.com905059436459
CONTACTFurkan TONTU, MD
furkantontu@gmail.com905465771656
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFurkan TONTU, MD

BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR HASTANESİ

STUDY_DIRECTORMuzaffer GENCER, MD

BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR HASTANESİ

STUDY_DIRECTORMurat Y Mersin, MD

BAŞAKŞEHİR ÇAM VE SAKURA ŞEHİR HASTANESİt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Oct 2, 2026