Skip to content

Effects of Irrigation Activation Methods on Periapical Healing in Chronic Apical Periodontitis

Evaluation of the Effects of Sonic, Ultrasonic, and Laser-Activated Irrigation on Periapical Healing in Teeth With Chronic Apical Periodontitis Using PAI and Fractal Analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07850895
Enrollment
108
Registered
2026-09-30
Start date
2024-03-06
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Apical Periodontitis

Keywords

Periapical Healing, Irrigation Activation, Sonic Activation, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation, Laser-Activated Irrigation, Periapical Index, Fractal Analysis, Root Canal Treatment

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effects of different irrigation activation methods on periapical healing in teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. Patients underwent root canal treatment using one of three irrigation activation methods: sonic activation, passive ultrasonic irrigation, or laser-activated irrigation. Periapical healing is evaluated by comparing baseline and follow-up periapical radiographs using the Periapical Index (PAI) and fractal analysis. PAI is used to assess changes in periapical status, while fractal dimension analysis is used to quantitatively evaluate changes in the trabecular bone structure in the periapical region. The study aims to determine whether the irrigation activation method used during root canal treatment influences subsequent periapical healing.

Interventions

Irrigating solutions were activated using an Er:YAG laser with the following parameters: SSP mode (50 μs), 0.3 W, 15 Hz, and 20 mJ. A radial laser tip was positioned in the coronal pulp chamber, and activation was performed for three 20-second cycles, for a total activation time of 60 seconds.

Irrigating solutions were activated using a sonic activation device. The activation tip was positioned 2 mm short of the working length, and sonic activation was performed for three 20-second cycles, for a total activation time of 60 seconds.

Irrigating solutions were activated using a passive ultrasonic irrigation device in endodontic mode. The activation tip was positioned 2 mm short of the working length, and ultrasonic activation was performed for three 20-second cycles, for a total activation time of 60 seconds.

Sponsors

Recep Tayyip Erdogan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged 18 years or older * Systemically healthy participants * Mandibular premolar teeth diagnosed with pulp necrosis and chronic apical periodontitis * Teeth undergoing single-visit root canal treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Use of any analgesic medication within 24 hours before root canal treatment or use of corticosteroid medications * Use of antibiotics within 1 week before root canal treatment * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Presence of any systemic disease, including conditions requiring antibiotic prophylaxis * Presence of mental or psychiatric disorders * Presence of swelling or pain on palpation before treatment * Presence of root resorption in the study tooth * Presence of generalized periodontitis * Presence of a periodontal pocket depth greater than 3 mm in the study tooth * Teeth with root fracture, ankylosis, or pathological mobility * Presence of a cystic lesion, defined as a lesion surrounded by a well-defined radiopaque border and causing displacement of adjacent teeth * Teeth with radiographically very narrow or wide root canals * Participants who did not attend the follow-up visit at least 6 months after root canal treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Periapical Index (PAI)Baseline and at least 6 months after root canal treatmentPeriapical healing will be assessed using the Periapical Index (PAI) on periapical radiographs. PAI scores range from 1 to 5, with lower scores indicating healthier periapical conditions and higher scores indicating greater severity of periapical pathology. Changes in PAI scores between baseline and follow-up radiographs will be evaluated.
Change in Fractal Dimension (FD)Baseline and at least 6 months after root canal treatmentFractal dimension (FD) will be calculated from standardized regions of interest on periapical radiographs using ImageJ software and the box-counting method. Changes in FD values between baseline and follow-up radiographs will be evaluated to quantitatively assess changes in the trabecular bone structure in the periapical region.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Oct 1, 2026