Skip to content

Human Albumin Combined With Plasma Exchange for Frailty Intervention

A Prospective, Randomized Exploratory Study on the Intervention of Frailty With Human Albumin Combined With Plasma Exchange

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07836127
Enrollment
34
Registered
2026-09-23
Start date
2026-09-24
Completion date
2028-11-14
Last updated
2026-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frailty, Plasma Exchange

Brief summary

Background Frailty is an age-related syndrome characterized by reduced physiological reserve, decreased stress tolerance and multisystem functional decline in the elderly, which markedly increases the risks of falls, hospitalization, functional impairment and all-cause mortality. Chronic low-grade inflammation, immune senescence, oxidative stress and abnormal protein modification are key mechanisms underlying the development and progression of frailty. Current mainstream interventions including nutritional support and physical exercise yield limited efficacy for moderate to severe frailty, and targeted therapies against biological aging mechanisms are still lacking.Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of plasma exchange combined with human albumin (ALB), with or without intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), in the treatment of frailty, and to preliminarily explore the potential mechanisms of the combined therapy.Methods This is a prospective, randomized, exploratory clinical trial. A total of 34 participants with a FRAIL scale score ≥ 1 will be enrolled and randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio into two groups, with 17 cases in each group: the plasma exchange plus ALB group and the plasma exchange plus ALB plus IVIg group. The study consists of a screening phase, a 5-month treatment phase with six intervention sessions, and follow-up visits at 1, 3 and 6 months after the final treatment. Frailty status, physical function, laboratory parameters, inflammatory levels and albumin modification will be dynamically assessed throughout the trial, and adverse events will be recorded.Results The trial has not yet been initiated. It is expected that the within-group and between-group comparisons will clarify the therapeutic effects and long-term stability of the two regimens, as well as their safety profiles. Changes in biomarkers will help illustrate the potential molecular mechanisms of plasma purification combined with functional protein supplementation for frailty.Conclusion Plasma exchange combined with ALB (with or without IVIg) can exert multi-target intervention on frailty by eliminating aging-related toxic factors and restoring plasma and immune homeostasis. The findings of this study will provide preliminary clinical evidence and theoretical basis for novel biological therapeutic strategies for frailty.

Detailed description

Frailty is a common age-related clinical syndrome characterized by progressive decline in physiological reserve, reduced stress tolerance, and multisystem functional impairment in older adults. It significantly increases the risk of adverse outcomes including falls, hospitalizations, functional dependence, and all-cause mortality. Chronic low-grade inflammation, immune senescence, oxidative stress, and abnormal protein modification are considered key biological mechanisms driving the onset and progression of frailty. Current mainstream interventions, such as nutritional support and physical exercise, have shown only limited efficacy in moderate to severe frailty, and targeted biological therapies for frailty remain lacking. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of plasma exchange combined with human albumin (ALB), with or without adjunctive intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), in the treatment of frailty, and to preliminarily explore the potential mechanisms underlying the combined therapy. This is a prospective, randomized, exploratory clinical trial. A total of 34 participants with a FRAIL scale score of ≥ 1 will be enrolled and randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio into two groups (17 participants in each group): the plasma exchange plus human albumin group (ALB group) and the plasma exchange plus human albumin plus intravenous immunoglobulin group (ALB + IVIg group). The study is divided into three phases: a screening phase, a treatment phase, and a follow-up phase. The screening phase will be conducted within 7 days prior to the first treatment. Eligible subjects will sign an informed consent form and complete a comprehensive baseline assessment, including frailty status evaluation, physical function testing, routine laboratory and imaging examinations, frailty-related biomarker detection, albumin (ALB) modification profiling, and inflammatory marker testing to confirm eligibility. The treatment phase will last for 5 months, consisting of a total of 6 treatment sessions administered monthly. Systemic assessments will be performed at each visit, including frailty status evaluation, physical function testing, routine pre-treatment examinations, frailty-related biomarker detection, ALB modification profiling, and inflammatory marker testing, to monitor treatment response and safety. Blood samples for complete blood count and coagulation function will be collected within 1 hour after the first plasma exchange session. All participants will receive plasma exchange with 5% human albumin solution as the replacement fluid, according to the study protocol. Subjects in the ALB + IVIg group will additionally receive intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) immediately after each plasma exchange session. Adverse events will be recorded throughout the study. Follow-up visits will be conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months after the final treatment session. All assessments and laboratory tests will be repeated to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and sustained effects of the interventions. This trial has not yet been initiated. It is expected that within-group and between-group comparisons will clarify the therapeutic effects and long-term stability of the two regimens, as well as their safety profiles. Changes in frailty-related biomarkers, inflammatory markers, and albumin modification patterns will help to illustrate the potential molecular mechanisms of plasma exchange combined with functional protein supplementation for frailty. It is hypothesized that plasma exchange combined with ALB (with or without IVIg) may exert multi-targeted intervention on frailty by eliminating aging-related toxic factors and restoring plasma and immune homeostasis. The findings of this study will provide preliminary clinical evidence and a theoretical basis for novel biological therapeutic strategies for frailty.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPlasma Exchange

Plasma exchange procedure, target exchange volume 50±5 mL/kg per session, flow rate 40-60 mL/min, administered once monthly for 6 cycles.

Equal-volume 5% human albumin solution used as replacement fluid during plasma exchange.

IVIg administered at a fixed dose of 2.5 g per subject, infused immediately after each plasma exchange session.

Sponsors

Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years. 2. Clear consciousness and ability to communicate. 3. Sufficient cognitive function and educational level to complete all study-related assessments. 4. A score of ≥ 1 on the FRAIL scale. 5. Voluntary written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to albumin (ALB) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). 2. Currently receiving albumin (ALB) and/or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) infusion for other reasons. 3. Severe cardiac, hepatic, or renal insufficiency. 4. Active infection or acute exacerbation of chronic infection. 5. Current use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). 6. History of bleeding disorders or coagulation dysfunction. 7. Concomitant malignancy or expected survival of less than 6 months. 8. Severe visual, auditory, or motor function impairment. 9. Refusal to sign the informed consent form. 10. Other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, make the participant unsuitable for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy rate of frailty intervention at 1 month after the last treatment1 month after the last treatmentCalculation formula: \[(Baseline score - Follow-up score at 1 month after the last treatment) / Baseline score\] × 100%. This rate represents the degree of improvement in patients' frailty status following intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy rate of frailty intervention assessed by FRAIL ScaleBaseline, 4 week, 8 week, 12 week, 16 week, 20 week, 24 week, 28 week, and 32 week after enrollmentThe efficacy rate of frailty intervention calculated based on the FRAIL Scale (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, Loss of weight). The scale ranges from 0 (no frailty) to 5 (severe frailty); higher scores indicate worse frailty status. Efficacy rate = (Baseline score - Score at follow-up) / Baseline score × 100%.
Strand specificity of frailty-related cfDNA and therapeutic response to plasma exchangeBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatmentAssess strand specificity of frailty-related circulating cell-free DNA and evaluate its predictive value for plasma exchange treatment response.
Clonal hematopoiesis gene mutation dynamics and correlation with frailtyBaseline, 4 week,24 week, 28 week, and 32 week after enrollmentObserve clonal hematopoiesis-associated gene mutation and clonal evolution at baseline, 1 month and 6 months post last treatment; explore the correlation between clonal hematopoiesis features and frailty status.
BCR clonotype characteristicsBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatmentAnalysis of BCR clonotype derived from identical BCR high-throughput sequencing assay. Assessments are performed at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatment.
BCR V/J gene usage biasBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatmentAnalysis of BCR V/J gene usage bias derived from identical BCR high-throughput sequencing assay. Assessments are performed at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatment.
BCR diversity indexBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatmentAnalysis of BCR diversity index derived from identical BCR high-throughput sequencing assay. Assessments are performed at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatment.
Frequency of senescence-associated antigen-specific B cell clonesBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatmentAnalysis of senescence-associated antigen-specific B cell clones derived from identical BCR high-throughput sequencing assay. Assessments are performed at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatment.
TCR clonotype characteristicsBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatmentAnalysis of TCR clonotype derived from a single unified TCR high-throughput sequencing assay. Assessments are performed at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatment.
TCR diversity indexBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatmentAnalysis of TCR diversity index derived from a single unified TCR high-throughput sequencing assay. Assessments are performed at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatment.
TCR V/J gene usage biasBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatmentAnalysis of TCR V/J gene usage bias derived from a single unified TCR high-throughput sequencing assay. Assessments are performed at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatment.
Frequency of senescence-associated antigen-specific T cell clonesBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatmentAnalysis of senescence-associated antigen-specific T cell clones derived from a single unified TCR high-throughput sequencing assay. Assessments are performed at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatment.
Between-group differences in frailty scale score: ALB group vs ALB+IVIg groupBaseline, 4 week, 8 week, 12 week, 16 week, 20 week, 24 week, 28 week, and 32 week after enrollmentCompare the changes of frailty scale score between albumin monotherapy group and albumin combined with IVIg group.
Baseline changes of serum ALB modification at 1 month after last treatment1 month after the last treatmentEvaluate the alterations of serum albumin subtypes including oxidation, glycation, nitration, sulfenylation, cysteinylation, cysteinylation combined with glycation versus baseline.
Changes from baseline in senescence-related indicators at 1 month after last treatment1 month after the last treatmentDetect plasma proteome and glycoproteome related to senescence, including SASP, serum inflammatory factors and epigenetic senescence clock, and analyze their changes compared with baseline.
Changes from baseline in Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) scoresBaseline, 4 week, 8 week, 12 week, 16 week, 20 week, 24 week, 28 week, and 32 week after enrollmentTo evaluate the changes of Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) score compared with baseline at each follow-up time point.
Changes from baseline in Fried Frailty Phenotype Scale scoresBaseline, 4 week, 8 week, 12 week, 16 week, 20 week, 24 week, 28 week, and 32 week after enrollmentTo evaluate the change of Fried Frailty Phenotype Scale score compared with baseline. This is one single outcome indicator (scale score) assessed repeatedly at multiple planned follow-up time points, not multiple distinct outcome measures.This represents one continuous outcome (Frailty Phenotype score) assessed longitudinally at multiple prespecified time points.
Changes from baseline in physical and mental health questionnaire scoresBaseline, 4 week, 8 week, 12 week, 16 week, 20 week, 24 week, 28 week, and 32 week after enrollmentAssess changes from baseline in EQ-5D, PROMIS-29, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) scale, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scoreBaseline, 4 week, 8 week, 12 week, 16 week, 20 week, 24 week, 28 week, and 32 week after enrollmentTo evaluate patients' physical function using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). This single continuous scale outcome will be repeatedly assessed at multiple scheduled follow-up time points.
Changes in gene mutation frequency and its correlation with immune cell subsetsBaseline, 1 month and 6 months after the last treatmentAnalyze the shift of gene mutation frequency before and after treatment, and explore the correlation between mutation frequency and immune cell profiles.
Changes from baseline in CRPBaseline, 4 week, 24 week, 28 week, and 32 week after enrollmentDetect serum CRP, and calculate their changes compared with baseline at predefined visits.
Changes from baseline in ESR levelsBaseline, 4 week, 24 week, 28 week, and 32 week after enrollmentDetect serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) , and calculate their changes compared with baseline at predefined visits.
Changes from baseline in ferritin levelsBaseline, 4 week, 24 week, 28 week, and 32 week after enrollmentTo assess changes in serum ferritin concentration relative to baseline.
Incidence of adverse events during treatmentFrom initiation of the first treatment through 6-month after completion of all study treatments, assessed up to 12 monthsThe incidence rate of all adverse events occurring during the treatment period will be calculated. Focused adverse events include catheter-related infections, hypersensitivity reactions, thrombosis, and other related adverse events.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTYing Wang
wangying@ihcams.ac.cn022-23608316

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 24, 2026