Skip to content

NIV-NAVA in Infants With Severe Bronchiolitis, a Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Non-invasive Ventilation With NAVA in Infants With Severe Bronchiolitis. A Multicenter Pilot Open Label Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (NAVIGATE Trial)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07834723
Acronym
NAVIGATE
Enrollment
90
Registered
2026-09-22
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2026-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Bronchiolitis, Pediatric Respiratory Distress

Keywords

bronchiolitis, pediatric intensive care unit, noninvasive ventilation, NAVA, intubation

Brief summary

Severe bronchiolitis is a common lung infection in babies that can cause serious breathing problems and often leads to hospitalization in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Many infants need special breathing support, usually through non-invasive methods like high-flow oxygen or continuous airway pressure. However, these methods don't always work, and about one in four infants end up needing a breathing tube (intubation), which comes with more risks and a longer recovery. A newer breathing support method called NIV-NAVA (non-invasive ventilation with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist) may help. It uses signals from the baby's diaphragm to adjust the support in real-time, making breathing easier and possibly reducing the need for intubation. While early results are promising, no high-quality clinical trial has yet tested if NIV-NAVA is better than standard non-invasive support. This study is a pilot trial - a small-scale version of a larger future study - happening in four PICUs across Canada. It will include 90 babies under 2 years old with severe bronchiolitis who need more support than standard methods provide. Half will receive NIV-NAVA, and half will receive the usual care. The main goal of this pilot is to check if a larger trial is doable: Can we recruit enough babies? Can the PICU teams stick to the treatment plan? Can we collect the right information? The full study will eventually look at whether NIV-NAVA really lowers the number of babies who need intubation and improves recovery. This research is led by a team of pediatric experts and could pave the way for better care for thousands of infants with severe breathing problems.

Detailed description

Goal(s) / Research Aims The primary objective of this multicenter pilot RCT is to determine the feasibility of a definitive multicenter RCT that will evaluate whether NIV-NAVA is superior to conventional NIV in infants with severe bronchiolitis who are not adequately supported by HFNC or CPAP. The primary hypothesis is that the pilot RCT will confirm the feasibility of the final trial. Methods / Approaches This is an investigator-led, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, pragmatic pilot trial conducted in four Canadian pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) with varying levels of experience with NIV-NAVA, supported by the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (CCCTG). Ninety infants younger than 2 years old who are admitted to the PICU with a clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis, who require NIV support greater than CPAP/HFNC, and who have no exclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 between NIV-NAVA and conventional NIV management. The pilot trial's feasibility outcomes are the recruitment rate (the primary outcome), adherence to the intervention, and completion of the definitive trial's outcome measures. The primary outcome of the future definitive RCT is the intubation rate. Secondary outcomes will include respiratory distress evolution, comfort, duration of ventilatory support, PICU and hospital length of stay, nutrition and sedation, complication rates, post-PICU functional outcomes, carbon footprint, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Expertise. An experienced, multidisciplinary team of senior, mid, and early career clinician scientists with unique expertise in pediatric NIV, trial methodology, pediatric respirology, and PICU research is leading this project. Expected Outcomes. We expect this pilot trial to confirm the feasibility of a definitive trial on NIV-NAVA in severe bronchiolitis. As the first RCT in this understudied field, it will provide much-needed evidence on the most effective strategy for reducing intubation rates in infants with severe bronchiolitis.

Interventions

DEVICENIV NAVA

Non-invasive support using NAVA technology

Sponsors

St. Justine's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

multicenter pilot open label praGmatic rAndomized conTrollEd trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 2 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Infants younger than 2 years old * admitted to the PICU (or managed by the PICU team while awaiting PICU admission) * with a clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis according to the treating team * requiring NIV support higher than CPAP/HFNC according to the treating team, a criteria present for less than 8 hours.

Exclusion criteria

* imminent intubation criteria * refusal by the physician in charge * chronic home ventilation * hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressors * contraindication to NIV or to gastric tube insertion * patients in whom a limitation of life-support treatment is considered

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recruitment ratefrom initiation to the end of the 6-month study enrolment period% of eligible patients (identified by screening) who are included in the study at each site and overall

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
adherence to the interventionduring the NIV support period, starting from randomization to the end of the bi-level support NIV (=no NIV-NAVA or BIPAP for at least 48 hours), up to a maximum of 28 daysIn the NAVA arm : % of patients who receive at least 2 hours of NIV-NAVA support, within 2 hours after randomization. In control arm: absence of NAVA use
completion of the definitive trial outcomesfrom initiation to the end of the 6-month study enrolment periodcompletion of the definitive trial outcomes : measurement of intubation rate, duration of ventilatory support, length of PICU and hospital stays
Evolution of the respiratory distress mWCAS scoreat randomization, and after 2, 6, and 24 hoursEvolution of mWCAS
Evolution of the respiratory distress ROX-HR scoreat randomization, and after 2, 6, and 24 hoursEvolution of ROX-HR scores
Evolution of the comfort scoreat randomization, and after 2, 6, and 24 hoursEvolution of the comfort score (FLACC)
Capacity to assess the evolution at 3 months post PICU3 months post PICU dischargePercentage of patients with assessment of PICS-p at 3 months post discharge

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTGuillaume Emeriaud, MD PhD
guillaume.emeriaud@umontreal.ca5143454708
CONTACTLucy Clayton, MSc
lucy.clayton.hsj@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGuillaume Emeriaud, MD PhD

CHU Sainte Justine, Université de Montréal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 23, 2026