Skip to content

ERAS Versus Conventional Care Following Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Versus Conventional Perioperative Care Following Gynaecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07832838
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-09-22
Start date
2026-09-20
Completion date
2028-05-01
Last updated
2026-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gynecologic Disease

Keywords

ERAS, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery, QoR-15, Perioperative Care, Quality of Recovery

Brief summary

This prospective randomized comparative study aims to compare Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus conventional perioperative care in women undergoing benign gynecological laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome is quality of recovery assessed by QoR-15 score at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include hospital stay, pain scores, bowel function, ambulation, analgesic consumption, PONV, complications, readmission, patient satisfaction and hospital cost.

Detailed description

Laparoscopic surgery is the standard approach for many benign gynecological conditions due to less tissue trauma, less pain and faster recovery. However perioperative care practices vary significantly and affect recovery. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary evidence-based pathway designed to reduce surgical stress and accelerate recovery. ERAS includes preoperative counseling and avoidance of prolonged fasting with clear fluids up to 2 hours and carbohydrate loading, no routine mechanical bowel preparation, standardized anesthesia with multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, goal-directed fluid therapy, active warming, postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, avoidance of drains, early oral intake, early mobilization and early urinary catheter removal. This study will randomize 100 women aged 18 to 60 years with ASA I-III scheduled for benign gynecological laparoscopic surgery into two groups in 1 to 1 ratio using computer-generated randomization. Group A will receive ERAS pathway and Group B will receive conventional care including NPO after midnight, bowel preparation with Prepawest, conventional NSAID analgesia, delayed feeding until bowel sounds return, and catheter retention until discharge. All patients will be followed for 30 days. Primary outcome is QoR-15 at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include VAS pain at 6, 12 and 24 hours, time to flatus, bowel movement, oral intake, ambulation, total analgesic consumption, PONV, complications classified by Clavien-Dindo, 30-day readmission, patient satisfaction and total hospital cost. Data will be analyzed using SPSS with t-test or Mann-Whitney for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher exact for categorical variables. P less than 0.05 is considered significant.

Interventions

Comprehensive ERAS pathway For Arm: ERAS Group

Standard routine care For Arm: Conventional Care Group

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 18-60 years * Indicated for benign gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery * ASA physical status I-III * Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Suspected gynecologic malignancy * Conversion to laparotomy * Severe systemic disease preventing ERAS implementation * Inability to comply with follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Recovery-15 score at 24 hoursAt 24 hours after surgeryQuality of Recovery-15 score measured by QoR-15 questionnaire from 0 to 150 higher score means better recovery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of postoperative hospital stayUp to 30 daysLength of stay measured in hours from end of surgery to discharge
Postoperative pain score at 6 hoursAt 6 hours after surgeryPain score measured by Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 higher score means worse pain
Postoperative pain score at 12 hoursAt 12 hours after surgeryPain score measured by Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 higher score means worse pain
Postoperative pain score at 24 hoursAt 24 hours after surgeryPain score measured by Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 higher score means worse pain
Time to first flatusUp to 48 hoursTime to first flatus measured in hours from end of surgery
Time to first bowel movementUp to 48 hoursTime to first bowel movement measured in hours from end of surgery
Time to first oral intakeUp to 48 hoursTime to first oral intake measured in hours from end of surgery
Time to first ambulationUp to 48 hoursTime to first ambulation measured in hours from end of surgery
Total analgesic consumptionWithin 24 hours after surgeryTotal analgesic consumption in milligrams within first 24 hours
Number of participants with postoperative nausea and vomitingWithin 24 hours after surgeryNumber of participants who develop postoperative nausea and vomiting
Number of participants with postoperative complicationsUp to 30 daysNumber of participants with postoperative complications classified by Clavien-Dindo classification
Number of participants with 30-day readmissionUp to 30 daysNumber of participants requiring hospital readmission within 30 days
Patient satisfaction scoreAt 24 hours after surgeryPatient satisfaction score measured on 0 to 10 scale higher score means greater satisfaction

Contacts

CONTACTsara M Farouk, resident
sameha.18313614@med.aun.edu.eg0 11 59002779
STUDY_CHAIRMahmoud S Mohamed, prof

obstetrics and gynaecology Department, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut, Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 23, 2026