Anterior Mandibular Fracture
Conditions
Brief summary
the goal of this clinical trial is to compare two methods of fixing fractures in the front part of the jaw (mandible): second-generation Herbert screws and 3-dimensional miniplates. Importance: Choosing the right fixation method is crucial for proper bone healing after a jaw fracture. Participants: Patients with recent anterior mandibular fractures requiring surgery. Key Findings: The study assessed which method better maintained bone density around the fracture, indicating potential benefits for healing. Implications: Understanding the effectiveness of these methods aids healthcare providers in making informed decisions, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Interventions
•The second-generation Herbert screw has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, offering compression across fracture lines and requiring less surgical exposure.
DEVICE3D mini plates
•Conventional fixation using 3D miniplates has been widely accepted for managing anterior mandibular fractures because of their ability to provide stable three-dimensional support
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* •Adult patients aged 18 years or older, irrespective of gender. * Anterior mandibular fractures indicated for open reduction and internal fixation (inter-foraminal). * Dentate/partially dentate patients.
Exclusion criteria
* •Medically compromised patients contradicting operation (ASA III, IV \& V). * Comminuted fractures. * Completely edentulous patients.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Interfragmentary Bone Density | Immediately postoperative (within one week) and after 3 months |
Contacts
CONTACTDina metwally
Outcome results
None listed