Skip to content

Observational Study on Eltrombopag in Hypocellular Myelodysplastic Neoplasms

Observational Study on Eltrombopag in Hypocellular Myelodysplastic Neoplasms

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07825207
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-09-17
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
2027-07-31
Last updated
2026-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelodysplastic Neoplasm, Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Keywords

Hypocellular Myelodysplastic Neoplasms, Eltrombopag, Thrombocytopenia, myelodysplastic Syndrome

Brief summary

Hypocellular myelodysplastic neoplasms (h-MDS) are a distinct entity introduced in the 2022 WHO classification. They are characterized by reduced bone marrow cellularity and may share several clinical, morphological, immunological, and molecular features with aplastic anemia (AA), making the differential diagnosis between the two conditions challenging. Eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with severe AA and has also shown activity in lower-risk MDS, with bone marrow hypocellularity identified as a potential predictor of response. In Italy, eltrombopag has been used off-label in patients with h-MDS and clinically relevant cytopenias. However, systematic real-world data on its effectiveness and safety in this patient population, either as monotherapy or in combination with immunosuppressive therapy (IST), remain limited. This is an observational study. We plan to analyse all patients with h-MDS consecutively diagnosed and included in the FISIM registry in 26 Italian centres. Study duration: 12 months Data to be collected: demographic, disease characteristics at diagnosis (blood count, morphology, histopathology, cytogenetics, multiparameter flow cytometry, presence of PNH clone, molecular data), response to treatment according to IWG criteria, progression to AML rate and survival. Centralized revision of bone marrow biopsy: bone marrow biopsy at diagnosis will be centrally reviewed

Detailed description

Myelodyspastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal haematopoietic stem cell disorders characterised by ineffective haematopoiesis, morphological dysplasia and a variable risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). These diseases generally occur in the elderly, with a median age of onset above 70 years. Recently, major advances in molecular technology and the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) have deepened our understanding of MDS pathobiology. Hence, the International Consensus Classification (ICC), and the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed in 2022 a revision to the current classification system. Hypocellular MDS (h-MDS), defined as a bone marrow cellularity of less than 30% in individuals younger than 60 years of age or less than 20% in those older than 70 years, is a new entity included in the WHO-2022 classification but not present in the ICC, accounting for 10-27% of all MDS cases (2,5-7). The different prevalences of h-MDS are reported because derive from heterogeneity across the studies in the criteria used to define bone marrow hypocellularity, or the inclusion of de novo or both de novo and secondary cases, or differences in genetic and environmental backgrounds among the populations studied and in the possible contamination with patients with aplastic anaemia (AA). Hypocellular MDS are characterized by bone marrow hypoplasia, a low rate of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and poor response to conventional MDS therapies. For at least some types of AA and MDS, the overwhelming body of evidence points to a shared pathogenesis and, more speculatively, a shared etiology. The pathogenesis of h-MDS involves immune system activation against hemopoietic precursor, which may explain the favourable response to immunosuppressive therapy. Recently, based on clinical features and immunologic and molecular studies, two phenotypes of h-MDS were identified and proposed: one with prevailing inflammation and immune activation defined AA-like, and the other characterized by genetic lesions, clonal selection and clonal evolution, named MDS-like. Differential diagnosis between h-MDS and AA can be difficult as the two pathologies have partially overlapping diagnostic criteria (8,9). Although cellularity easily differentiates h-MDS from normo/hypercellular cases, the distinction from AA is harder when only clinical features are considered. The presence of \>10% dysplasia of one lineage would distinguish h-MDS from AA in hypercellular cases and MDS from Idiopatic Cytopenia of Unknown Significance (ICUS). Compared to AA patients, h-MDS are usually older, show marrow dysplasia, and display more BM blasts and more frequent cytogenetic or molecular alterations. The occasional presence of PNH clones in the setting of h-MDS may point toward the diagnosis of AA. Cytogenetic abnormalities are found in about 50% of MDS and FISH analysis could help to better define category group including chromosome 3, 5, and 7 alterations. Mutational pattern of h-MDS seems to overlap with the classic MDS pattern except for the relative absence of spliceosoma mutations or myeloproliferative features (SRSF2, ZRSR2, U2AF1) and lower frequency of RUNX1, ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2, and TP53 mutations. Using the Internationally Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and its revised version (IPSS-R) , h-MDS are classified as low risk and associated with more favourable outcome versus non h-MDS The treatment options used were mainly directed at controlling cytopenias rather than eradication of disease. Lower Risk patients are commonly treated with lower intensity therapies such as hematopoietic growth factors or immunomodulatory agents, while hypomethylating agents, cytotoxic agents, or allo-HCT are typically reserved for higher risk patients. In some series a hypocellular marrow predicted a higher likelihood of response, analogous to the response to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in aplastic anemia. Younger age, normal karyotype or trisomy 8, lack of transfusion dependence, and the presence of a PNH clone predicted response to immunosuppressive therapy, but none is a robust biomarker as responses have also been noted in lower risk MDS patients without these features. Beyond IST therapy, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA have been studied in MDS with variable response rates. Eltrombopag, a TPO-RA, was first used to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, but has also been shown to improve hematologic response in patients with refractory severe AA and to increase overall and complete responses when combined with standard immunosuppression in treatment-naïve severe AA. In a phase III study eltrombopag has shown activity in low risk MDS with thrombocytopenia. In a phase II study on 25 LR-MDS patients eltrombopag lead to a bilineage response in 44% of patients and hypocellularity was a predictor of response. On the basis of this encouraging data eltrombopag has been used in Italy in h\_MDS with clinically relevant cytopenias off-label. Data on eltrombopag use outside from clinical trials in a real-world setting, alone or in combination with other IST are missing.

Interventions

Eltrombopag administered as part of routine clinical practice for the treatment of hypocellular myelodysplastic neoplasms. The study retrospectively and prospectively evaluates the effectiveness and safety of eltrombopag in patients treated with eltrombopag monotherapy or in combination with immunosuppressive therapy.

Sponsors

Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche-ETS
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients (i.e. aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with MDS-h according to WHO 2022 * IPSS-R risk very-low to intermediate * De novo or therapy related MDS * Availability of bone marrow sample for central revision * Treatment with eltrombopag, in monotherapy or associated with IST, as first -line therapy or as a subsequent therapy to the first line

Exclusion criteria

* Unavailability of bone marrow sample for central revision

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR)From initiation of eltrombopag treatment through the last available response assessment, up to study completion.Overall response rate to eltrombopag according to the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria (Cheson 2006)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR) of eltrombopag combined with immunosuppressive drugsFrom initiation of eltrombopag treatment through the last available response assessment, up to study completion.Overall response rate to eltrombopag when administered in combination with immunosuppressive drugs.
Overall Survival (OS)From diagnosis and from initiation of eltrombopag treatment until death or last available follow-up, up to study completion.Overall survival from diagnosis and from initiation of eltrombopag treatment.
Duration of Response (DoR)From achievement of response until loss of response, death, or last available follow-up, up to study completion.Duration of response to eltrombopag.
Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)From initiation of eltrombopag treatment through the end of treatment, up to study completion.Percentage of participants experiencing adverse events and serious adverse events reported in relation to eltrombopag treatment.
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) RateFrom diagnosis through study completion.Rate of progression to acute myeloid leukemia.
Time to AML ProgressionFrom diagnosis and from initiation of eltrombopag treatment until AML progression or last available follow-up, up to study completion.Time to progression to acute myeloid leukemia from diagnosis and from initiation of eltrombopag treatment

Countries

Italy

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORElena Crisà, MD

INOC

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 18, 2026