Skip to content

Ketamine Treatment for Treatment-Resistant Depression - the Role of Framing

A Single-center Open-label Randomized Parallel-group Superiority Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Psychedelic and Biomedical Framing of Intravenous Ketamine for Treatment-resistant Depression - the KetSet Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07824973
Acronym
KetSet
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-09-17
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2030-08-01
Last updated
2026-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)

Keywords

ketamine, psychological framing, psychedelic

Brief summary

Ketamine is a medicine used in psychiatry for treatment-resistant depression. This study compares two ways of framing ketamine treatment: a psychedelic framing and a biomedical framing. The study will examine whether the framing affects depressive symptoms, treatment experience, tolerability, and longer-term outcomes.

Detailed description

Ketamine is increasingly used in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression. In this study, ketamine is administered in the same clinical manner in both groups, but the treatment context differs. One group receives a psychedelic framing that presents subjective ketamine experiences as potentially meaningful and therapeutically relevant, while the other group receives a biomedical framing that presents ketamine as a pharmacological treatment and subjective effects as side effects. The study compares the effects of these two framings on depressive symptoms, treatment experience, tolerability, and selected longer-term outcomes measured through follow-up assessments and national registers.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPsychedelic framing

The intervention includes: * Psychedelic framed patient information (video) * Psychedelic environment during infusions (mindfulness practice, music, eye mask) and psychological support provided towards engaging in the inner experience * Interview on the ketamine-induced experience

BEHAVIORALBiomedical framing

The intervention includes: * Biomedically framed patient information (video) * Psychological support provided during the infuion towards alleviating side effects such as dissociation * CADSS and BPRS

Sponsors

Valdemar Landgren
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive ketamine treatment with either psychedelic framing or biomedical framing. The ketamine dosing and infusion schedule are identical in both groups; only the framing and supporting context differ.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Prescribed ketamine treatment for depression * Able to understand study information and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

\- Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in depressive symptoms (MADRS total score)Baseline to week 12Mean change from baseline to week 12 in depressive symptoms measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The MADRS is a clinician-rated 10-item scale (0-6 per item; total score range 0-60), with higher scores indicating more severe depression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MADRS response and remissionWeek 12Proportion of participants achieving response and remission at week 12 based on MADRS total score. Response is defined as ≥50% reduction from baseline. Remission is defined as MADRS \<11.
Self-reported depressive symptoms (MADRS-S)Baseline, weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, and month 6Change over time in self-reported depressive symptoms measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale - Self-rated (MADRS-S). The MADRS-S is a 9-item scale (0-6 per item; total score range 0-54), with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
Suicidal ideation (MADRS-S item 9)Baseline, weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, and month 6Change over time in self-reported suicidal ideation measured by item 9 of the MADRS-S (score 0-6; higher scores indicate greater severity).
Time to hospitalizationBaseline to 12 monthsTime from baseline to first hospitalization due to depression during follow-up
Adverse events and treatment discontinuationBaseline to week 12Incidence of adverse events (mild, moderate, severe) and time to treatment discontinuation for any reason.
Ketamine-related adverse effects (Modified KSET)Week 1 and week 4Ketamine-related adverse effects measured with a modified version of the Ketamine Side Effect Tool (KSET), a 20-item patient-rated scale (0-3 per item; higher scores indicate greater side effect burden).
Quality of life and health (VAS)Baseline, weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, and months 6 and 12Change in self-rated quality of life and health measured with a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life and health.
Satisfaction with lifeBaseline to week 12Life satisfaction measured with the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). The SWLS has 5 items rated on a 7-point scale, with total scores ranging from 5 to 35. Higher scores indicate greater life satisfaction.
Subjective sleep qualityBaseline to week 12Subjective sleep quality measured with the Brief Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI). The questionnaire asks about sleep habits during the previous month and includes bedtime, sleep latency, wake time, sleep duration, nighttime sleep problems, overall sleep quality, and use of sleep medication. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Perceived social supportBaseline to week 12Perceived social support measured with the Social Provisions Scale-5 (SPS-5). The scale has 5 items rated on a 4-point scale from 1 to 4, with total scores ranging from 5 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater perceived social support.
LonelinessBaseline to week 12Loneliness measured with the UCLA Loneliness Scale, 3-item version. The scale has 3 items rated from 1 to 3, with total scores ranging from 3 to 9. Higher scores indicate greater loneliness.
Screen timeBaseline to week 12Screen time measured with the Screen Time questionnaire (ScrT), which assesses average daily time spent on social media, gaming, TV/streaming, and background TV/streaming use. Higher response categories indicate more screen exposure.
AbsorptionBaseline to week 12Trait absorption measured with the Modified Tellegen Absorption Questionnaire (MODTAS). The questionnaire assesses tendency to become fully absorbed in sensory, imaginative, or experiential activities; higher scores indicate greater absorption.
Trait anxietyBaseline to week 12Trait anxiety measured with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory short form (STAI-SF). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety-proneness.
Cognitive fusionBaseline to week 12Cognitive fusion measured with the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ-7). The questionnaire has 7 items rated on a 7-point scale; total scores range from 7 to 49. Higher scores indicate greater cognitive fusion, meaning more entanglement with thoughts and less psychological flexibility.
Goal attainment for behavioral activationWeek 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12Goal attainment measured with the Goal Attainment Scale for Depression (GAS-D). Individual goals are rated on a 5-point scale from -2 to +2, where 0 reflects expected goal attainment and higher scores indicate better-than-expected attainment.
Therapeutic alliancebaseline, week 2, 6 and 12Therapeutic alliance measured with the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised (WAI-SR) completed by participants and the Working Alliance Inventory - Short form (WAI-SRT) completed by clinicians. The instruments assess the quality of the working relationship across goal agreement, task agreement, and bond. Higher scores indicate a stronger therapeutic alliance.
Acute mystical and challenging experiencesImmediately after each of 6 infusions during weeks 1 to 4Acute ketamine-related subjective experiences measured after each infusion with the Mystical Experience Questionnaire short form (MEQ-4) and the Challenging Experience Questionnaire short form (CEQ-7). The MEQ-4 is a 4-item self-report measure of mystical-type experience, scored 0 to 5 per item, with higher scores indicating a stronger mystical experience. The CEQ-7 is a 7-item self-report measure of challenging experience, scored 0 to 5 per item, with higher scores indicating a more difficult or distressing experience.
Mystical experienceWeek 5Mystical experience measured with the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ-30). The MEQ-30 is a 30-item self-report questionnaire scored on a 0 to 5 scale and assesses mystical-type experience across domains such as unity, sacredness, positive mood, transcendence of time and space, and ineffability. Higher scores indicate a stronger mystical experience.
ExpectancyBaseline, week 1 and 2Treatment expectation measured with patient- and clinician-rated treatment expectation questionnaires. The patient questionnaire and clinician questionnaire assess expected benefit from treatment and perceived treatment credibility. Higher scores indicate greater treatment expectancy.
Drug liking and perceived drug effectsImmediately after infusion 2 and infusion 6 during weeks 1 and 4Acute drug effects measured with the Drug Effect Questionnaire (DEQ). The DEQ uses 0 to 100 visual analogue ratings to assess perceived drug effect, feeling high, liking and disliking effects, and desire for more drug. Higher scores indicate stronger perceived drug effects and greater drug liking or desire for more drug, depending on the item.
Altered states of consciousnessWeek 5Altered states of consciousness measured with the 5-Dimensional Altered States of Consciousness Scale (5D-ASC). The 5D-ASC assesses five dimensions of altered consciousness; higher scores indicate a more intense altered state in the relevant dimension.
Psychological insightWeek 5Psychological insight measured with the Psychological Insight Scale (PIS). The PIS contains 7 items rated from 0 to 100 and assesses new insight into one's past, self, lifestyle, and behavior change. Higher scores indicate greater psychological insight.
Treatment evaluationWeek 6Treatment evaluation measured with patient- and clinician-rated treatment evaluation questionnaires. These questionnaires assess overall appraisal of the treatment experience and perceived usefulness of the intervention. Higher scores indicate a more positive treatment evaluation.
Personality traitsBaselinePersonality measured with the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). The TIPI is a 10-item self-report measure of the Big Five personality traits: extraversion, emotional stability, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. It is administered as a baseline covariate; higher trait scores indicate more of the relevant personality dimension.
Substance-related convictions or diagnoses12 monthsOccurrence of a drug-related conviction or substance use disorder diagnosis during follow-up.
Work ability and social transfers12 monthsEmployment-related income and social transfer dependence during follow-up, assessed as income net of social transfers.
Psychotropic medication use12 monthsAverage daily defined dose of prescribed psychotropic medication during follow-up.

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

CONTACTAlexandra Leinonen, MD
alexandra.leinonen@gu.se+46706371348

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 18, 2026